From d7b899201707b095039a1ebb921f49c76269ebf4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Aditya Rathore <153427299+AdityaDRathore@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Tue, 27 May 2025 19:17:34 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 1/6] feat: implement RBAC middleware for permission and role checks --- .../middleware/rbacMiddleware.ts | 140 ++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 140 insertions(+) diff --git a/backend/src/authorization/middleware/rbacMiddleware.ts b/backend/src/authorization/middleware/rbacMiddleware.ts index e69de29..f21a663 100644 --- a/backend/src/authorization/middleware/rbacMiddleware.ts +++ b/backend/src/authorization/middleware/rbacMiddleware.ts @@ -0,0 +1,140 @@ +import { Request, Response, NextFunction } from 'express'; +import { Permission } from '../constants/permissions'; +import { UserRole } from '@prisma/client'; +import { hasPermission, hasAnyPermission, AuthUser } from '../utils/permissionChecker'; +import { HttpException } from '../../exceptions/HttpException'; + +/** + * Interface for authenticated user in request, reflecting actual usage/errors + */ +export interface RequestUser { + id: string; + role: UserRole; + organizationId?: string | null; +} + +// Extend Express Request interface to include user +// This is a standard way to augment Express's Request type. +// If @typescript-eslint/no-namespace is strict, you might need to disable it for this block. +// eslint-disable-next-line @typescript-eslint/no-namespace +declare global { + // eslint-disable-next-line @typescript-eslint/no-namespace + namespace Express { + interface Request { + user?: RequestUser; + } + } +} + +/** + * Options for the RBAC middleware + */ +interface RBACOptions { + allowMultiple?: boolean; +} + +// Helper to adapt RequestUser to AuthUser +const adaptUserForPermissionChecker = (user: RequestUser): AuthUser => { + return { + ...user, + user_role: user.role, // Map role to user_role + }; +}; + +/** + * Middleware to check if user has the required permissions + * @param permissions Array of permissions required to access the route + * @param options Configuration options + * @returns Express middleware + */ +export const requirePermissions = (permissions: Permission[], options: RBACOptions = {}) => { + return (req: Request, res: Response, next: NextFunction): void => { + if (!req.user) { + return next(new HttpException(401, 'Authentication required')); + } + + const { allowMultiple = false } = options; + const adaptedUser = adaptUserForPermissionChecker(req.user); + + const hasRequiredPermissions = allowMultiple + ? hasAnyPermission(adaptedUser, permissions) + : permissions.every(permission => hasPermission(adaptedUser, permission)); + + if (!hasRequiredPermissions) { + return next(new HttpException(403, 'Insufficient permissions')); + } + + next(); + }; +}; + +/** + * Middleware to check if user has the required role + * @param roles Array of roles required to access the route + * @param options Configuration options + * @returns Express middleware + */ +export const requireRoles = (roles: UserRole[], options: RBACOptions = {}) => { + return (req: Request, res: Response, next: NextFunction): void => { + if (!req.user) { + return next(new HttpException(401, 'Authentication required')); + } + + const { allowMultiple = false } = options; + + const hasRequiredRole = allowMultiple + ? roles.includes(req.user.role) // Use req.user.role directly + : req.user.role === roles[0]; // Use req.user.role directly + + if (!hasRequiredRole) { + return next(new HttpException(403, 'Insufficient role permissions')); + } + + next(); + }; +}; + +// Type guard to check if an item is a UserRole +function isUserRole(item: Permission | UserRole): item is UserRole { + // Check if 'item' is one of the string values of the UserRole enum + return Object.values(UserRole).some(roleValue => roleValue === item); +} + +/** + * Combined middleware to check if user has any of the specified permissions or roles + * @param permissionsOrRoles Array of permissions or roles + * @returns Express middleware + */ +export const requireAny = (permissionsOrRoles: (Permission | UserRole)[]) => { + return (req: Request, res: Response, next: NextFunction): void => { + if (!req.user) { + return next(new HttpException(401, 'Authentication required')); + } + + const separatedPermissions: Permission[] = []; + const separatedRoles: UserRole[] = []; + + for (const item of permissionsOrRoles) { + if (isUserRole(item)) { + // Use the type guard + separatedRoles.push(item); // item is now UserRole + } else { + // item is now Permission (or string, if Permission is string) + separatedPermissions.push(item); + } + } + + const adaptedUser = adaptUserForPermissionChecker(req.user); + + const hasAnyOfPermissions = + separatedPermissions.length > 0 ? hasAnyPermission(adaptedUser, separatedPermissions) : false; + const hasAnyOfRoles = + separatedRoles.length > 0 ? separatedRoles.includes(req.user.role) : false; + + if (!hasAnyOfPermissions && !hasAnyOfRoles) { + return next(new HttpException(403, 'Insufficient permissions')); + } + + next(); + }; +}; From 705c942f584a649e810aa5672c6bab10527bed2a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Aditya Rathore <153427299+AdityaDRathore@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Tue, 27 May 2025 19:17:42 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 2/6] feat: add resource access middleware for permission checks and organization validation --- .../middleware/resourceAccessMiddleware.ts | 232 ++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 232 insertions(+) create mode 100644 backend/src/authorization/middleware/resourceAccessMiddleware.ts diff --git a/backend/src/authorization/middleware/resourceAccessMiddleware.ts b/backend/src/authorization/middleware/resourceAccessMiddleware.ts new file mode 100644 index 0000000..5f398fb --- /dev/null +++ b/backend/src/authorization/middleware/resourceAccessMiddleware.ts @@ -0,0 +1,232 @@ +import { Request, Response, NextFunction } from 'express'; +import { ResourceType, OWNERSHIP_BYPASS_PERMISSIONS } from '../constants/ownership'; +import { + canAccessResource, + hasAnyPermission, + AuthUser as PermissionCheckerAuthUser, +} from '../utils/permissionChecker'; +import { HttpException } from '../../exceptions/HttpException'; +import { Permission } from '../constants/permissions'; +import { PrismaClient, Admin } from '@prisma/client'; // Import Admin type +import { RequestUser } from './rbacMiddleware'; + +const prisma = new PrismaClient(); + +// Helper to adapt RequestUser to PermissionCheckerAuthUser +const adaptUserForPermissionChecker = (user: RequestUser): PermissionCheckerAuthUser => { + return { + ...user, + user_role: user.role, + }; +}; + +interface ResourceAccessOptions { + paramName?: string; + resourceIdGetter?: (req: Request) => string; + ownershipBypass?: Permission[]; +} + +export const requireResourceAccess = ( + resourceType: ResourceType, + requiredPermission: Permission, + options: ResourceAccessOptions = {}, +) => { + return async (req: Request, res: Response, next: NextFunction): Promise => { + // Added return type Promise + if (!req.user) { + return next(new HttpException(401, 'Authentication required')); + } + + const adaptedUser = adaptUserForPermissionChecker(req.user); + + let resourceId: string; + const { paramName = 'id', resourceIdGetter } = options; + + if (resourceIdGetter) { + resourceId = resourceIdGetter(req); + } else { + resourceId = req.params[paramName]; + } + + if (!resourceId) { + return next( + new HttpException(400, `Resource ID not found. Expected in parameter '${paramName}'`), + ); + } + + const bypassPermissions = [ + ...(OWNERSHIP_BYPASS_PERMISSIONS[resourceType] || []), + ...(options.ownershipBypass || []), + ]; + + if (bypassPermissions.length > 0 && hasAnyPermission(adaptedUser, bypassPermissions)) { + return next(); + } + + try { + const canAccess = await canAccessResource( + adaptedUser, + resourceType, + resourceId, + requiredPermission, + ); + + if (!canAccess) { + return next(new HttpException(403, 'You do not have permission to access this resource')); + } + + next(); + } catch (error) { + console.error('Resource access check failed:', error); + if (error instanceof HttpException) { + next(error); + } else { + next( + new HttpException( + 500, + 'Error checking resource access: ' + + (error instanceof Error ? error.message : 'Unknown error'), + ), + ); + } + } + }; +}; + +export const requireSameOrganization = ( + resourceType: ResourceType, + options: ResourceAccessOptions = {}, +) => { + return async (req: Request, res: Response, next: NextFunction): Promise => { + // Added return type Promise + const user = req.user as RequestUser | undefined; // Cast is okay here after check + + if (!user) { + return next(new HttpException(401, 'Authentication required')); + } + + if (!user.organizationId) { + return next(new HttpException(403, 'User not associated with any organization')); + } + const userOrganizationId = user.organizationId; + + let resourceId: string; + const { paramName = 'id', resourceIdGetter } = options; + + if (resourceIdGetter) { + resourceId = resourceIdGetter(req); + } else { + resourceId = req.params[paramName]; + } + + if (!resourceId) { + return next( + new HttpException(400, `Resource ID not found. Expected in parameter '${paramName}'`), + ); + } + + try { + let resourceOrganizationId: string | null | undefined = null; + + switch (resourceType) { + case ResourceType.USER: { + const resourceUser = await prisma.user.findUnique({ where: { id: resourceId } }); + resourceOrganizationId = resourceUser?.organizationId; + break; + } + case ResourceType.ADMIN: { + const admin: Admin | null = await prisma.admin.findUnique({ where: { id: resourceId } }); + // Assuming Admin model might have an optional organizationId or a relation to it. + // If Admin model *definitely* doesn't have it, this case needs rethinking. + // For now, let's assume it *could* have it, making it type-safe. + // You'll need to define organizationId on the Admin model in schema.prisma for this to be truly effective. + if (admin && 'organizationId' in admin) { + resourceOrganizationId = (admin as Admin & { organizationId?: string | null }) + .organizationId; + } else { + // Handle case where admin is found but has no organizationId property, + // or if Admins are not organization-specific. + // This might mean access is allowed, or denied, or this check is not applicable. + // For now, if no organizationId, it won't match userOrganizationId unless both are null/undefined. + } + break; + } + case ResourceType.LAB: { + const lab = await prisma.lab.findUnique({ where: { id: resourceId } }); + resourceOrganizationId = lab?.organizationId; + break; + } + case ResourceType.TIME_SLOT: { + const timeSlot = await prisma.timeSlot.findUnique({ + where: { id: resourceId }, + include: { lab: true }, + }); + resourceOrganizationId = timeSlot?.lab?.organizationId; + break; + } + case ResourceType.BOOKING: { + const booking = await prisma.booking.findUnique({ + where: { id: resourceId }, + include: { timeSlot: { include: { lab: true } } }, + }); + resourceOrganizationId = booking?.timeSlot?.lab?.organizationId; + break; + } + case ResourceType.WAITLIST: { + const waitlist = await prisma.waitlist.findUnique({ + where: { id: resourceId }, + include: { timeSlot: { include: { lab: true } } }, + }); + resourceOrganizationId = waitlist?.timeSlot?.lab?.organizationId; + break; + } + case ResourceType.NOTIFICATION: { + const notification = await prisma.notification.findUnique({ + where: { id: resourceId }, + include: { user: true }, + }); + resourceOrganizationId = notification?.user?.organizationId; + break; + } + case ResourceType.ORGANIZATION: { + resourceOrganizationId = resourceId; + break; + } + default: { + const exhaustiveCheck: never = resourceType; + return next( + new HttpException( + 500, + `Organization check not implemented for resource type: ${exhaustiveCheck}`, + ), + ); + } + } + + if (!resourceOrganizationId) { + return next( + new HttpException(404, 'Resource not found or not associated with an organization'), + ); + } + + if (resourceOrganizationId !== userOrganizationId) { + return next(new HttpException(403, 'Resource does not belong to your organization')); + } + + next(); + } catch (error) { + console.error('Organization access check failed:', error); + if (error instanceof HttpException) { + next(error); + } else { + next( + new HttpException( + 500, + 'Error checking organization access: ' + + (error instanceof Error ? error.message : 'Unknown error'), + ), + ); + } + } + }; +}; From d29abddd69c4be56cff14e072302c5941f587135 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Aditya Rathore <153427299+AdityaDRathore@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Tue, 27 May 2025 19:17:50 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 3/6] feat: add unit tests for RBAC middleware functions --- .../__tests__/rbacMiddleware.test.ts | 146 ++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 146 insertions(+) create mode 100644 backend/src/authorization/middleware/__tests__/rbacMiddleware.test.ts diff --git a/backend/src/authorization/middleware/__tests__/rbacMiddleware.test.ts b/backend/src/authorization/middleware/__tests__/rbacMiddleware.test.ts new file mode 100644 index 0000000..ab7f33d --- /dev/null +++ b/backend/src/authorization/middleware/__tests__/rbacMiddleware.test.ts @@ -0,0 +1,146 @@ +import { Request, Response } from 'express'; +import { requirePermissions, requireRoles, requireAny, RequestUser } from '../rbacMiddleware'; // Import RequestUser +import { UserRole } from '@prisma/client'; +import { USER_PERMISSIONS, ADMIN_PERMISSIONS } from '../../constants/permissions'; +import { HttpException } from '../../../exceptions/HttpException'; + +// Mock request, response, and next function +const mockRequest = (user?: RequestUser): Partial => ({ + // Use RequestUser + user, +}); + +const mockResponse = (): Partial => ({ + status: jest.fn().mockReturnThis(), + json: jest.fn(), +}); + +const mockNext = jest.fn(); + +describe('RBAC Middleware', () => { + beforeEach(() => { + jest.clearAllMocks(); + }); + + describe('requirePermissions', () => { + it('should call next() if user has all required permissions', () => { + const req = mockRequest({ + id: '123', + role: UserRole.ADMIN, // Uses 'role' as per RequestUser + }) as Request; + + const res = mockResponse() as Response; + const middleware = requirePermissions([ADMIN_PERMISSIONS.READ_USERS]); + + middleware(req, res, mockNext); + + expect(mockNext).toHaveBeenCalledWith(); + expect(mockNext).not.toHaveBeenCalledWith(expect.any(HttpException)); + }); + + it('should call next() with HttpException if user does not have required permissions', () => { + const req = mockRequest({ + id: '123', + role: UserRole.USER, // Uses 'role' + }) as Request; + + const res = mockResponse() as Response; + const middleware = requirePermissions([ADMIN_PERMISSIONS.READ_USERS]); + + middleware(req, res, mockNext); + + expect(mockNext).toHaveBeenCalledWith(expect.any(HttpException)); + expect(mockNext.mock.calls[0][0].status).toBe(403); + }); + + it('should call next() with HttpException if user is not authenticated', () => { + const req = mockRequest() as Request; // No user + const res = mockResponse() as Response; + const middleware = requirePermissions([USER_PERMISSIONS.READ_LABS]); + + middleware(req, res, mockNext); + + expect(mockNext).toHaveBeenCalledWith(expect.any(HttpException)); + expect(mockNext.mock.calls[0][0].status).toBe(401); + }); + }); + + describe('requireRoles', () => { + it('should call next() if user has the required role', () => { + const req = mockRequest({ + id: '123', + role: UserRole.ADMIN, // Uses 'role' + }) as Request; + + const res = mockResponse() as Response; + const middleware = requireRoles([UserRole.ADMIN]); + + middleware(req, res, mockNext); + + expect(mockNext).toHaveBeenCalledWith(); + expect(mockNext).not.toHaveBeenCalledWith(expect.any(HttpException)); + }); + + it('should call next() with HttpException if user does not have the required role', () => { + const req = mockRequest({ + id: '123', + role: UserRole.USER, // Uses 'role' + }) as Request; + + const res = mockResponse() as Response; + const middleware = requireRoles([UserRole.ADMIN]); + + middleware(req, res, mockNext); + + expect(mockNext).toHaveBeenCalledWith(expect.any(HttpException)); + expect(mockNext.mock.calls[0][0].status).toBe(403); + }); + }); + + describe('requireAny', () => { + it('should call next() if user has any of the required permissions', () => { + const req = mockRequest({ + id: '123', + role: UserRole.USER, // Uses 'role' + }) as Request; + + const res = mockResponse() as Response; + const middleware = requireAny([USER_PERMISSIONS.READ_LABS, ADMIN_PERMISSIONS.READ_USERS]); + + middleware(req, res, mockNext); + + expect(mockNext).toHaveBeenCalledWith(); + expect(mockNext).not.toHaveBeenCalledWith(expect.any(HttpException)); + }); + + it('should call next() if user has any of the required roles', () => { + const req = mockRequest({ + id: '123', + role: UserRole.USER, // Uses 'role' + }) as Request; + + const res = mockResponse() as Response; + const middleware = requireAny([UserRole.USER, UserRole.ADMIN]); + + middleware(req, res, mockNext); + + expect(mockNext).toHaveBeenCalledWith(); + expect(mockNext).not.toHaveBeenCalledWith(expect.any(HttpException)); + }); + + it('should call next() with HttpException if user does not have any of the required permissions or roles', () => { + const req = mockRequest({ + id: '123', + role: UserRole.USER, // Uses 'role' + }) as Request; + + const res = mockResponse() as Response; + const middleware = requireAny([ADMIN_PERMISSIONS.READ_USERS, UserRole.ADMIN]); + + middleware(req, res, mockNext); + + expect(mockNext).toHaveBeenCalledWith(expect.any(HttpException)); + expect(mockNext.mock.calls[0][0].status).toBe(403); + }); + }); +}); From 8b704820511fc94524e70f43d5e4a4d9968c8ee7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Aditya Rathore <153427299+AdityaDRathore@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Tue, 27 May 2025 19:17:58 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 4/6] feat: implement authorization context and middleware for access control --- .../src/authorization/utils/authContext.ts | 110 ++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 110 insertions(+) create mode 100644 backend/src/authorization/utils/authContext.ts diff --git a/backend/src/authorization/utils/authContext.ts b/backend/src/authorization/utils/authContext.ts new file mode 100644 index 0000000..2960cb4 --- /dev/null +++ b/backend/src/authorization/utils/authContext.ts @@ -0,0 +1,110 @@ +import { Request, Response, NextFunction } from 'express'; +import { UserRole } from '@prisma/client'; +import { ResourceType } from '../constants/ownership'; +import { HttpException } from '../../exceptions/HttpException'; +import { RequestUser } from '../middleware/rbacMiddleware'; + +/** + * Authorization context containing information needed for authorization decisions + */ +export interface AuthContext { + userId: string; + userRole: UserRole; + organizationId?: string | null; + resourceType?: ResourceType; + resourceId?: string; + requestTime?: Date; + requestMethod?: string; + requestPath?: string; + additionalData?: Record; +} + +/** + * Create an authorization context from a request + * @param req Express request + * @param resourceType Optional resource type + * @param resourceId Optional resource ID + * @returns Authorization context + */ +export const createAuthContextFromRequest = ( + req: Request, + resourceType?: ResourceType, + resourceId?: string, +): AuthContext | null => { + const user = req.user as RequestUser | undefined; + if (!user) { + return null; + } + + return { + userId: user.id, + userRole: user.role, + organizationId: user.organizationId, + resourceType, + resourceId, + requestTime: new Date(), + requestMethod: req.method, + requestPath: req.path, + }; +}; + +/** + * Check if a context satisfies time-based restrictions + * @param context Authorization context + * @param startTime Start of allowed time window (hours 0-23) + * @param endTime End of allowed time window (hours 0-23) + * @param daysOfWeek Array of allowed days (0-6, where 0 is Sunday) + * @returns Boolean indicating if time restrictions are satisfied + */ +export const checkTimeRestrictions = ( + context: AuthContext, + startTime: number, + endTime: number, + daysOfWeek: number[] = [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6], +): boolean => { + const now = context.requestTime || new Date(); + const currentHour = now.getHours(); + const currentDay = now.getDay(); + + return currentHour >= startTime && currentHour < endTime && daysOfWeek.includes(currentDay); +}; + +/** + * Create a middleware that uses context for authorization decisions + * @param checkFn Function that checks if access is allowed based on context + * @param resourceType Optional resource type + * @param resourceIdParam Parameter name in URL that contains resource ID + * @returns Express middleware + */ +export const createContextMiddleware = ( + checkFn: (context: AuthContext) => boolean | Promise, + resourceType?: ResourceType, + resourceIdParam: string = 'id', +) => { + return async (req: Request, res: Response, next: NextFunction): Promise => { + const user = req.user as RequestUser | undefined; + if (!user) { + return next(new HttpException(401, 'Authentication required')); + } + + const resourceId = req.params[resourceIdParam]; + const context = createAuthContextFromRequest(req, resourceType, resourceId); + + if (!context) { + return next(new HttpException(401, 'Could not create authorization context')); + } + + try { + const isAllowed = await Promise.resolve(checkFn(context)); + + if (!isAllowed) { + return next(new HttpException(403, 'Access denied based on context')); + } + + next(); + } catch (error) { + console.error('Context-based authorization error:', error); + next(new HttpException(500, 'Error during context-based authorization')); + } + }; +}; From fbdd4149fdde0d55faaa0728056c6296bfe9161a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Aditya Rathore <153427299+AdityaDRathore@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Tue, 27 May 2025 19:18:06 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 5/6] feat: export AuthUser interface and add custom HttpException class for API error handling --- .../authorization/utils/permissionChecker.ts | 2 +- backend/src/exceptions/HttpException.ts | 20 +++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644 backend/src/exceptions/HttpException.ts diff --git a/backend/src/authorization/utils/permissionChecker.ts b/backend/src/authorization/utils/permissionChecker.ts index 91110ca..8377379 100644 --- a/backend/src/authorization/utils/permissionChecker.ts +++ b/backend/src/authorization/utils/permissionChecker.ts @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ const prisma = new PrismaClient(); /** * User with role information */ -interface AuthUser { +export interface AuthUser { id: string; user_role: UserRole; organizationId?: string | null; diff --git a/backend/src/exceptions/HttpException.ts b/backend/src/exceptions/HttpException.ts new file mode 100644 index 0000000..ed53141 --- /dev/null +++ b/backend/src/exceptions/HttpException.ts @@ -0,0 +1,20 @@ +/** + * Custom HTTP exception class for handling API errors + * Extends the standard Error class with an HTTP status code + */ +export class HttpException extends Error { + public status: number; + public message: string; + + /** + * Create a new HTTP exception + * @param status HTTP status code + * @param message Error message + */ + constructor(status: number, message: string) { + super(message); + this.status = status; + this.message = message; + this.name = 'HttpException'; + } +} From 10f21261f433ef2a83a445a4ef0ab98cd67aaabb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Aditya Rathore <153427299+AdityaDRathore@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Tue, 27 May 2025 19:23:52 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 6/6] feat: update development plan to reflect completion of RBAC middleware tasks --- .../Development Plan Complete.md | 8 ++--- .../Implementation/Develpment Plan Backend.md | 32 +++++++++---------- 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/Implementation/Development Plan Complete.md b/docs/Implementation/Development Plan Complete.md index 05aa118..9f64682 100644 --- a/docs/Implementation/Development Plan Complete.md +++ b/docs/Implementation/Development Plan Complete.md @@ -111,10 +111,10 @@ Corresponds to Backend Plan - PHASE 1 (Day 3 Completion), PHASE 2, PHASE 3 (Day * [x] Task 1.3: Resource Ownership Rules * [x] Task 1.4: Permission Matrix Documentation * **Day 2: RBAC Middleware Implementation** - * [ ] Task 2.1: Enhance Role Middleware - * [ ] Task 2.2: Resource Access Control - * [ ] Task 2.3: Context-Aware Authorization - * [ ] Task 2.4: Testing Authorization Logic + * [x] Task 2.1: Enhance Role Middleware + * [x] Task 2.2: Resource Access Control + * [x] Task 2.3: Context-Aware Authorization + * [x] Task 2.4: Testing Authorization Logic * **Day 3: Authorization Utilities & Integration** * [ ] Task 3.1: Permission Checking Utilities * [ ] Task 3.2: Audit Logging diff --git a/docs/Implementation/Develpment Plan Backend.md b/docs/Implementation/Develpment Plan Backend.md index 2001e76..16ef005 100644 --- a/docs/Implementation/Develpment Plan Backend.md +++ b/docs/Implementation/Develpment Plan Backend.md @@ -82,22 +82,22 @@ **Day 2: RBAC Middleware Implementation** -* [ ] Task 2.1: Enhance Role Middleware - * [ ] Extend existing role checking middleware. - * [ ] Add support for multiple roles. - * [ ] Implement permission-based access control. -* [ ] Task 2.2: Resource Access Control - * [ ] Create middleware for resource ownership verification. - * [ ] Implement hierarchical access patterns. - * [ ] Add support for delegated permissions. -* [ ] Task 2.3: Context-Aware Authorization - * [ ] Design authorization context objects. - * [ ] Implement time-based access restrictions if needed. - * [ ] Create helper functions for common authorization patterns. -* [ ] Task 2.4: Testing Authorization Logic - * [ ] Create test cases for permission checks. - * [ ] Test ownership verification logic. - * [ ] Verify hierarchical access control. +* [x] Task 2.1: Enhance Role Middleware + * [x] Extend existing role checking middleware. + * [x] Add support for multiple roles. + * [x] Implement permission-based access control. +* [x] Task 2.2: Resource Access Control + * [x] Create middleware for resource ownership verification. + * [x] Implement hierarchical access patterns. + * [x] Add support for delegated permissions. +* [x] Task 2.3: Context-Aware Authorization + * [x] Design authorization context objects. + * [x] Implement time-based access restrictions if needed. + * [x] Create helper functions for common authorization patterns. +* [x] Task 2.4: Testing Authorization Logic + * [x] Create test cases for permission checks. + * [x] Test ownership verification logic. + * [x] Verify hierarchical access control. **Day 3: Authorization Utilities & Integration**