Should we rename DiagnosticReport and DICOM metadata files #30

Open

opened

on May 15, 2015

To match our accession numbers as our unique identifier? I think that using the last 4 of the StudyUID gets confusing as it's not easily seen in a typical PACS viewer.

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

No labels

No labels

Type

No type

Fields

No fields configured for issues without a type.

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests