Skip to content

Weighted Cores? #14

@aebrer

Description

@aebrer

Instead of the common core being all the atoms which are in every core, could the core be more fluid? As in, every atom is in the core, but weighted by the number of pairs for which it's in the core. Then, we would consider the information about a 100% atom to be more significant than a 90% atom, but we wouldn't consider a 90% atom to be equivalent to a 0% atom (which is essentially what we do now).

This would require altering the overlay algorithm to overlay using all atoms, but weight them when minimizing the overlay score. This would also require a new definition for convergence being reached.

This would probably make computation take much longer.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Type

    No type
    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions