Skip to content
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
44 changes: 34 additions & 10 deletions data/comparisons/imputations.yaml
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -15,12 +15,18 @@ imputations:
Enhanced CPS first assigns `takes_up_snap_if_eligible` using a
USDA take-up-rate prior while preserving CPS-reported SNAP
recipients as take-up anchors. Calibration/local-area builds then
rerandomize the SNAP gate with block-level seeded draws and L0
reweighting governs final state and national SNAP totals.
rerandomize the SNAP gate with block-level seeded draws, and L0
reweighting solves a single constrained optimization that
simultaneously matches state and national SNAP outlay dollars
AND state-level SNAP recipient-household counts (so total
dollars and caseloads are both pinned to administrative targets
in the same pass, rather than benefits emerging from caseload
alignment).
baseDataset: Enhanced CPS
calibrationTargets:
- state-level SNAP dollars
- national SNAP outlays
- state-level SNAP outlay dollars
- national SNAP outlay dollars
- state-level SNAP recipient-household counts
documentationUrl: https://github.com/PolicyEngine/policyengine-us-data
reproducible: yes
sources:
Expand All @@ -46,7 +52,12 @@ imputations:
selects other eligible units by comparing participation
probabilities to program-specific random numbers. Probabilities
vary by unit type, benefit level, state, and citizenship; the
baseline is aligned to administrative caseload targets.
baseline is aligned to administrative caseload counts and
composition. Total benefit outlay dollars are an emergent
property (participation × rule-computed benefit) rather than an
explicit calibration target — they're approximated through the
benefit-band composition target, not solved for directly. See
Wheaton & Tran (Urban) on SNAP anti-poverty effects.
baseDataset: CPS-ASEC
calibrationTargets:
- administrative caseload by state
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -160,6 +171,10 @@ imputations:
employment, disability, and state-status predictors; baseline
probabilities and random numbers are adjusted so true reporters
are included and the caseload matches administrative targets.
Total TANF outlays are not an explicit calibration constraint —
they emerge from (caseload × rule-computed benefit). PE-US, by
contrast, includes TANF outlay dollars (state + national) and
TANF-recipient unit counts as simultaneous L0 targets.
baseDataset: CPS-ASEC
calibrationTargets:
- administrative TANF caseload size
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -237,13 +252,22 @@ imputations:
Medicaid eligibility is computed rule-by-rule by state. The
Enhanced CPS assigns `takes_up_medicaid_if_eligible` with
state-specific KFF / MACPAC-derived priors and preserves reported
Medicaid coverage at interview as an enrollment anchor. Calibration
rerandomizes the Medicaid gate for take-up-affected targets and L0
reweighting governs final Medicaid enrollment counts and spending.
Medicaid coverage at interview as an enrollment anchor.
Calibration rerandomizes the Medicaid gate for take-up-affected
targets and L0 reweighting governs final Medicaid enrollment
counts. Important methodological caveat: unlike SNAP / TANF /
SSI where the per-unit benefit is a rule-computed dollar
amount (a function of income, household size, deductions),
Medicaid has no per-individual benefit formula in the model —
spending is assigned as a per-capita constant from CMS
administrative data. So "Medicaid spending" effectively falls
out as (enrolled people × per-capita spend) and a separate
L0 dollar target adds little information beyond the enrollment
count target.
baseDataset: Enhanced CPS
calibrationTargets:
- state and national Medicaid enrollment counts
- national Medicaid spending
- state and national Medicaid enrollment counts (primary)
- national Medicaid spending (derivative — = enrolled × per-capita constant)
documentationUrl: https://github.com/PolicyEngine/policyengine-us-data
reproducible: yes
sources:
Expand Down