Performance on MR dataset

[nick11roberts]

Hi there, I see that the best reported accuracy for this repo for the MR dataset is 77.5% using CNN-rand-static. When I run this, using ./main.py -device=0 -static, I get much lower numbers (~70%). Two questions:

1. What training settings are you using to get 77.5%?
2. How are you evaluating on the MR dataset to get 77.5%?

Thanks!

[A11en0]

same problem.

[A11en0]

Hi there, I see that the best reported accuracy for this repo for the MR dataset is 77.5% using CNN-rand-static. When I run this, using ./main.py -device=0 -static, I get much lower numbers (~70%). Two questions:

1. What training settings are you using to get 77.5%?
2. How are you evaluating on the MR dataset to get 77.5%?

Thanks!

How did you handle the problem?