Architecture review: project structure and code quality #2
Description
Description
Review the initial codebase for architecture, code quality, and best practices before adding more features.
Review Areas
Project Structure
- Module boundaries make sense (cli.py, config.py, password.py, vault.py, keys.py, yaml_util.py)
- src layout correct for packaging
- No circular imports
Code Quality
- Error handling consistent and user-friendly
- Type hints complete and correct
- mypy strict mode passes
- bandit security scan clean
- No hardcoded values or magic strings
CLI Design
- Command names and flags intuitive
- Help texts clear and complete
- Output formatting consistent (German user messages)
- Exit codes correct (0 success, 1 error)
Testing
- Test coverage adequate (currently ~80%)
- Edge cases covered
- Fixtures well-structured
- Integration tests use real ansible-vault (not mocked)
Configuration
- Config discovery logic robust (env, upward search, user-global)
- Path resolution correct (relative to config file)
- Password fallback chain complete
CI/CD & Tooling
- pre-commit hooks match CI pipeline
- semantic-release config correct
- ruff rules appropriate
Outcome
List of actionable improvements as sub-issues or a checklist in this issue.