Skip to content

Adding check for ACKs? #20

@Juul

Description

@Juul

It would be really nice if we got an error when the CH341 is unable to communicate with the EEPROM instead of just reading 0xFF and having to guess if we're reading an empty EEPROM.

aystarik added this feature in his fork and that feature works, but unfortunately aystarik changed a ton of other stuff and after playing around with their fork it's obvious to me that it's buggy and unreliable.

If someone wants to have a look at how aystarik did it then the relevant commit is here

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions