[UX] Improve the plan format

[peterschmidt85]

1. Run configuration type:

• Consider showing some minor properties only if --verbose is set, e.g. project, user
• Consider not showing configuration properties if they're not set (and there is no default value), e.g. max_price, retry, max_duration, inactivity_duration, etc.
• Consider including all major configuration properties if they are set, e.g. nodes, fleets, regions, etc.
• Consider using space more efficiently, e.g. via multi-column layout?
• For resources, currently the default resources are shown as cpu=2.. mem=8GB.. disk=100GB.. - it doesn't mention the important default for gpu. The correct plan should be cpu=2.. mem=8GB.. disk=100GB.. gpu: 1..
• (Optional) Consider using exact property names, e.g. inactivity_duration instead of Inactivity duration

2. Other configuration types:

Potentially, this also applies to other types of configurations but that can be done via another issue.

[peterschmidt85]

1. Run configuration type:

Also:

• Effective gateway (if selected)

[r4victor]

The correct plan should be cpu=2.. mem=8GB.. disk=100GB.. gpu: 1..

@peterschmidt85, Do you suggest to change the gpu default to gpu: 1..? Currently, it's gpu: None.

[peterschmidt85]

@r4victor
I'm sorry, I meant 0.. (which None is resolved to)

[r4victor]

@peterschmidt85, gpu: 0.. is also different from gpu: None. Currently, if gpu is specified but vendor is omitted, vendor defaults to nvidia. If gpu is not specified (gpu: None), there are no gpu filters at all.

[peterschmidt85]

@r4victor
Here’s a suggestion based on our discussion during the call:

1. Use 0..1 instead of None as the default (and make sure it’s reflected in dstack apply).
2. Do not default the vendor to nvidia.

[r4victor]

You sure 0..1 is a good idea (seems random), or better 0..?

[peterschmidt85]

Im so sorry for my bad attention this morning. Yes, I meant 0..