devflow-cli has been refactored and renamed to gitwise — a focused AI git toolbelt with four orthogonal commands. The full pipeline surface (PRD → techspec → tasks → run-tasks → test → done → status, plus init) has been removed.
If you were using devflow-cli primarily for commit, review, pr, or release, switching to gitwise is a straight-across rename — see the Direct equivalents table. If you were using the pipeline commands, see Removed commands for what is gone and why.
npm uninstall -g @denisvieiradev/devflow-cli
npm install -g @denisvieiradev/gitwise
gw --helpThe binary changed: devflow … → gw …. The npm package changed: @denisvieiradev/devflow-cli → @denisvieiradev/gitwise.
These commands map across with no behavioral loss.
devflow-cli |
gitwise |
Notes |
|---|---|---|
devflow commit |
gw commit |
Multi-context commit splitting unchanged. Same conventional-commits output, same sensitive-file filter. |
devflow commit --push |
gw commit --push |
Identical. |
devflow review |
gw review |
Review is no longer coupled to a techspec; it operates on the current branch's diff vs. base only. --json available for scripting. |
devflow pr |
gw pr |
Same auto-drafted title + body. New: --update refreshes the body when a PR already exists on the branch. |
devflow release |
gw release |
Same semver bump + Keep-a-Changelog + release notes flow. Localized notes (PT / ES / FR) preserved. |
The free-form intent argument is new everywhere: gw commit "drop the unused imports", gw pr "explain the migration shape", etc. It is always optional.
These commands are gone and not coming back in MVP. The "Why" column explains the rationale captured in the PRD's Non-Goals and ADR-001.
devflow-cli |
Replacement | Why |
|---|---|---|
devflow init |
(none — no setup required) | gitwise has no required initialization. The first gw invocation prompts once for a provider (Claude Code subprocess or Anthropic API) and writes ~/.gitwise/config.json. There is no per-repo .gitwise/ directory created by tooling. |
devflow prd <description> |
(none — outside scope) | Pipeline command. gitwise is positioned as an AI git toolbelt, not a planning pipeline. Use a separate planning tool of your choice (or your own notes) for PRD authoring. |
devflow techspec [ref] |
(none — outside scope) | Pipeline command. Same reasoning as prd. |
devflow tasks [ref] |
(none — outside scope) | Pipeline command. Same reasoning as prd. |
devflow run-tasks [ref] |
(none — outside scope) | Pipeline command. Auto-implementation of pipeline tasks is no longer part of the product. |
devflow test [ref] |
(none — outside scope) | Pipeline command. Test plan generation was tied to the pipeline state machine. |
devflow done [ref] |
(none — outside scope) | Pipeline command. Without state.json there is nothing to "finalize". |
devflow status |
(none — outside scope) | Pipeline command. There is no per-feature progress to track because there are no features. Use git status, git log, and gh pr status for the actual git/PR state. |
devflow-cli tried to own the entire idea-to-merge pipeline. That coupling created real costs: required init, persistent .devflow/state.json, SHA-based drift detection across artifacts, and a state machine users had to keep in their heads. The pivot to gitwise keeps the pieces that were genuinely high-value (multi-context commit splitting, AI-drafted PRs, AI review, semver-aware releases) and drops the pieces that prescribed a workflow.
See ADR-001 for the full decision context.
devflow-cli stored config in .devflow/config.json (per-repo). gitwise splits config into:
~/.gitwise/config.json(user-global) — provider, models, language, default base branch, commit convention.<repo>/.gitwise.json(optional, per-repo override) — same fields, deep-merged on top of the user config.~/.gitwise/.env(single line,0600) —ANTHROPIC_API_KEY=.... Never written intoconfig.json.
There is no automated migration from .devflow/ to ~/.gitwise/. The schemas are similar enough that you can copy fields by hand:
provider—"claude"→"api";"claude-code"stays.models— same keys (fast,balanced,powerful); update IDs to whichever Claude versions you want pinned.language— same (en/pt/es/fr).commitConvention— same (conventional/free).
Pipeline-only fields (branchPattern, contextMode, project.*) have no analogue and can be dropped.
gitwise ignores .devflow/ entirely. You can leave it in place, delete it, or move it to a backup if you want a record of the PRDs and techspecs you previously generated. gitwise will not read or write to it.
If you had custom templates under .devflow/templates/:
commit.md,pr.md,release-version.md,release-changelog.md,release-notes.md— move to<repo>/.gitwise/templates/(per-repo) or~/.gitwise/templates/(user-global). They will be picked up by the same regex{{variable}}interpolation.prd.md,techspec.md,tasks.md— no replacement. The corresponding commands are gone.- A new
review.mdtemplate is supported ingitwise; the previousdevflow reviewhad its prompt inlined in code.
File issues on the new repository: https://github.com/denisvieiradev/gitwise (replacing the archived devflow-cli issue tracker).