📝 Description
A clear and concise description of what the feature is.
Implement incident analytics and automatic graphical reports for reported incidents. When the "Analytics / Report Graphics" tab is opened, the system should automatically generate visualizations (bar charts, pie/donut charts, time-series, heatmaps, and top-N lists) that surface common attributes across reported incidents (type, severity, status, reporter, assignee, environment, tags, affected component, etc.). Analytics must be derived from existing incident data; do not create new database tables.
💡 Rationale
Why is this needed?
Operators and incident managers need quick, actionable insights into incident trends and commonalities without manually exporting data or running ad-hoc queries. An automated analytics view speeds triage, helps prioritize fixes, and surfaces systemic issues (hot components, recurring error messages, high-severity clusters) visually.
🛠️ Proposed Solution
A brief sketch of how we might implement this.
-
Frontend
- Add/extend the Analytics / Report Graphics tab UI to render charts when the tab is opened.
- Use an existing or repo-consistent charting library (Chart.js, ECharts, Recharts, or ApexCharts) and build reusable chart components.
- Provide filters: date range, project, incident type, severity, tags, assignee, environment.
- Support drill-down by clicking chart segments to view underlying incident lists.
- Add export options: PNG/SVG for charts and CSV for aggregated data.
-
Backend
- Add aggregation endpoints (e.g. GET /api/analytics/incidents?metrics=...) that compute aggregates on-demand using existing incident schema (SQL GROUP BY). Do NOT create new DB tables.
- Prefer server-side SQL aggregations for large datasets; fall back to in-memory aggregation for small datasets or prototyping.
- Add short-lived caching (in-memory or Redis) with a configurable TTL for common queries to improve repeated load performance.
- Implement paging/limits for drill-down lists and top-N queries (e.g., top 50), and provide full CSV export for complete results.
-
Performance & Safety
- Use proper indexing for aggregation columns to keep queries efficient. For very large datasets, consider optional background pre-aggregation or materialized views as a follow-up (out of initial scope as it requires DB changes).
- Mask or exclude PII from default aggregates/exports unless explicitly authorized.
-
Tests & Docs
- Add unit/integration tests for aggregation endpoints and UI rendering paths.
- Document endpoints, front-end components, and how to add new analytics metrics in the repository docs.
-
Example checklist
✅ Acceptance Criteria
How will we know this is finished?
📌 Additional Context
- Keep implementation consistent with existing repository patterns (preferred charting library, API conventions, auth). If the repo already uses a charting library, prefer that to avoid adding dependencies.
- This feature focuses on on-demand aggregation (no scheduled reporting) and explicitly avoids new DB schema changes.
- Suggested visualizations: bar charts, pie/donut charts, line/area time-series, heatmaps/matrices, and top-N lists.
📝 Description
A clear and concise description of what the feature is.
Implement incident analytics and automatic graphical reports for reported incidents. When the "Analytics / Report Graphics" tab is opened, the system should automatically generate visualizations (bar charts, pie/donut charts, time-series, heatmaps, and top-N lists) that surface common attributes across reported incidents (type, severity, status, reporter, assignee, environment, tags, affected component, etc.). Analytics must be derived from existing incident data; do not create new database tables.
💡 Rationale
Why is this needed?
Operators and incident managers need quick, actionable insights into incident trends and commonalities without manually exporting data or running ad-hoc queries. An automated analytics view speeds triage, helps prioritize fixes, and surfaces systemic issues (hot components, recurring error messages, high-severity clusters) visually.
🛠️ Proposed Solution
A brief sketch of how we might implement this.
Frontend
Backend
Performance & Safety
Tests & Docs
Example checklist
src/✅ Acceptance Criteria
How will we know this is finished?
📌 Additional Context