You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
β οΈPartial dataset: The logs() collector hit the 60s bridge deadline on the initial call and both retries. 84 of ~175 attempted run directories were fully downloaded, covering roughly the 05:10β11:23 UTC window of 2026-07-02. Absolute totals below under-count the true 24h figures; treat them as a lower bound. Prior days (06-30, 07-01) were similarly partial, so day-over-day comparisons are noisy.
Today at a Glance
Metric
Value
π€ Total Runs
84 (65 β / 19 β)
π― Success Rate
77.4%
π GitHub REST API Calls
27,495 (core quota consumed β includes reads, writes, and all GitHub API operations)
π Safe-Output Writes
0 (issues + PRs + comments + discussions created by safe-output tools; source: run_summary.run.SafeItemsCount)
β± Avg Duration
672s (p95: 1255s)
π GitHub API Calls Trend (90 days)
Total REST API consumption has run in the tens-of-thousands per day since the tracking window opened, with a standout spike on 2026-06-17 (~574K). The 7-day rolling average sits near 48K calls/day, though several recent days (06-30, 07-01, 07-02) reflect partial log collection and therefore dip below the true totals.
π GitHub API Calls by Workflow Trend (30 days)
The PR-review family β Test Quality Sentinel, Matt Pocock Skills Reviewer, Design Decision Gate, Impeccable Skills Reviewer, and PR Code Quality Reviewer β consistently tops per-workflow consumption. These reviewers fire on PR activity and each burns a few thousand core-quota calls per day, tracking well above the 30-day average total line.
π GitHub REST API Calls Heatmap (90 days)
The heatmap shows sustained weekday activity through mid/late June, with the darkest cells clustering around 06-24 to 06-29 (peak days of 70Kβ88K calls). The lighter recent cells for 06-30 and 07-02 are collection artifacts (partial windows) rather than a genuine drop in activity.
Consumption is moderately concentrated: the top five PR-review workflows together account for roughly 70% of the captured 24h REST API calls. No single workflow dominates outright β the leader, Test Quality Sentinel, is ~21% of the total β so there is no single runaway consumer, but the reviewer cluster as a whole is the clear cost center.
π GitHub REST API Consumption by Workflow (last 24h)
The top consumer (Test Quality Sentinel, 5,791 calls) sits comfortably under the 15,000/hr core limit, and no captured workflow approaches it. The optimization opportunity is in the PR-review cluster: five reviewers each run per PR and collectively drive most consumption β deduplicating overlapping GitHub reads across them (shared PR/file fetches) would cut the largest slice.
Top 10 Workflows by REST API Consumption (last 24h)
Workflow
REST API Calls
Runs
Avg Duration
Test Quality Sentinel
5,791
4
548s
Matt Pocock Skills Reviewer
4,265
4
874s
Design Decision Gate ποΈ
3,973
4
463s
Impeccable Skills Reviewer
2,837
4
723s
PR Code Quality Reviewer
2,542
4
637s
Smoke CI
2,328
9
238s
PR Description Updater
1,878
3
534s
PR Sous Chef
1,298
5
557s
Contribution Check
1,203
2
1194s
AI Moderator
991
2
1165s
Trending Indicators
7-day API trend: β +129.4% vs. previous 7 days (inflated by partial-collection days; interpret with caution)
30-day API trend: β (insufficient data β 44 of the 60 days needed for a full 30-vs-30 comparison)
GitHub REST API call rate: ~48,011 calls/day over last 7 days (hourly limit: 15,000 β per-run consumption stays well under this)
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
π GitHub API Consumption Report
Report Date: 2026-07-02 Β· Repository: github/gh-aw Β· Run: #28586712992
Today at a Glance
run_summary.run.SafeItemsCount)π GitHub API Calls Trend (90 days)
Total REST API consumption has run in the tens-of-thousands per day since the tracking window opened, with a standout spike on 2026-06-17 (~574K). The 7-day rolling average sits near 48K calls/day, though several recent days (06-30, 07-01, 07-02) reflect partial log collection and therefore dip below the true totals.
π GitHub API Calls by Workflow Trend (30 days)
The PR-review family β Test Quality Sentinel, Matt Pocock Skills Reviewer, Design Decision Gate, Impeccable Skills Reviewer, and PR Code Quality Reviewer β consistently tops per-workflow consumption. These reviewers fire on PR activity and each burns a few thousand core-quota calls per day, tracking well above the 30-day average total line.
π GitHub REST API Calls Heatmap (90 days)
The heatmap shows sustained weekday activity through mid/late June, with the darkest cells clustering around 06-24 to 06-29 (peak days of 70Kβ88K calls). The lighter recent cells for 06-30 and 07-02 are collection artifacts (partial windows) rather than a genuine drop in activity.
π© Top API Burners (24h)
Consumption is moderately concentrated: the top five PR-review workflows together account for roughly 70% of the captured 24h REST API calls. No single workflow dominates outright β the leader, Test Quality Sentinel, is ~21% of the total β so there is no single runaway consumer, but the reviewer cluster as a whole is the clear cost center.
π GitHub REST API Consumption by Workflow (last 24h)
The top consumer (Test Quality Sentinel, 5,791 calls) sits comfortably under the 15,000/hr core limit, and no captured workflow approaches it. The optimization opportunity is in the PR-review cluster: five reviewers each run per PR and collectively drive most consumption β deduplicating overlapping GitHub reads across them (shared PR/file fetches) would cut the largest slice.
Top 10 Workflows by REST API Consumption (last 24h)
Trending Indicators
π¦ Cache Memory Status
/tmp/gh-aw/cache-memory/trending/api-consumption/history.jsonlAutomatically generated by the api-consumption-report workflow.
Warning
Firewall blocked 1 domain
The following domain was blocked by the firewall during workflow execution:
awmgmcpgSee Network Configuration for more information.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions