audit: Documentation completeness and quality

[Snider]

Audit: Documentation

Evaluate documentation for completeness and usability.

README Assessment

1. Project Description - Clear purpose?
2. Quick Start - Can get running in < 5 min?
3. Installation - All steps documented?
4. Configuration - Env vars explained?
5. Examples - Usage examples provided?
6. Badges - Build status, coverage, version?

Code Documentation

1. Function Docs - Public APIs documented?
2. Parameter Types - Types documented?
3. Return Values - Documented?
4. Examples - Code examples in docs?
5. Outdated Docs - Code changed, docs not?

Architecture Documentation

1. System Overview - High-level architecture?
2. Data Flow - How data moves?
3. Component Diagram - Visual representation?
4. Decision Records - ADRs present?

Developer Documentation

1. Contributing Guide - How to contribute?
2. Development Setup - Local dev environment?
3. Testing Guide - How to run tests?
4. Code Style - Standards documented?

User Documentation

1. User Guide - End-user documentation?
2. FAQ - Common questions answered?
3. Troubleshooting - Common issues?
4. Changelog - Version history?

Output

Save to AUDIT-DOCUMENTATION.md

List specific documentation gaps to fill.

[google-labs-jules]

Jules is on it. When finished, you will see another comment and be able to review a PR.

[google-labs-jules]

Ready for a review! A PR has been created.