One thing I noticed today while attempting to package up my software (which depends on libzbar-cil and libzbar*) is that libzbar-cil references libzbar[.dll], whereas zbar seems to distribute the DLL as libzbar-0[.dll]. I don't really remember why this wasn't a problem earlier, but I assume that I probably manually copied x to y within the installation folder to make things work. That is always an option for deployment too, but it does raise the question of why libzbar is distributed that way and why libzbar-cil references it by another name. Do you also copy libzbar-0.dll to libzbar.dll or is your environment just different than mine?
One thing I noticed today while attempting to package up my software (which depends on libzbar-cil and libzbar*) is that libzbar-cil references libzbar[.dll], whereas zbar seems to distribute the DLL as libzbar-0[.dll]. I don't really remember why this wasn't a problem earlier, but I assume that I probably manually copied x to y within the installation folder to make things work. That is always an option for deployment too, but it does raise the question of why libzbar is distributed that way and why libzbar-cil references it by another name. Do you also copy libzbar-0.dll to libzbar.dll or is your environment just different than mine?