feature: Implement additional features of WITH clause

[aheev]

Currently, WITH clause doesn't support some of the features like

• distinct. Related issue: Unable to COUNT(DISTINCT x) on nodes #108
• aliasing whole nodes/rels. Related issue: WITH clause fails to parse, despite being mentioned in DeepWiki docs #102 (comment)

[aheev]

@beinan do we want to support these features? Also, other features mentioned in https://neo4j.com/docs/cypher-manual/25/clauses/with/

[prrao87]

I think a couple of these were merged in #86? Not sure if making a new release will at least unblock some of the cases where WITH is necessary.

[aheev]

I think a couple of these were merged in #86?

Yes. I meant the rem ones

Not sure if making a new release will at least unblock some of the cases where WITH is necessary.

Yes. Mind you the above issues I mentioned are from local

[prrao87]

This has been fixed in the 0.5.0 release.