Hi, thank you so much for putting this book up; I am really enjoying it. I apologize if this isn't the right avenue for this, but I think
"The biggest thing to be cautious of when your goal is to describe is making the leap from description to causation (implicitly or explicitly)."
might have a typo in it. In particular, I think there is an extra "is" in the following
"be cautious of when your goal is to describe is making the leap".
I'm guessing it was intended to read
"be cautious of when your goal to describe is making the leap"
Link for convenience
https://www.r-causal.org/chapters/01-casual-to-causal#relationship-to-causal-inference
Again, thank you so much for all the effort and apologize is this is not the avenue for this.
Hi, thank you so much for putting this book up; I am really enjoying it. I apologize if this isn't the right avenue for this, but I think
"The biggest thing to be cautious of when your goal is to describe is making the leap from description to causation (implicitly or explicitly)."
might have a typo in it. In particular, I think there is an extra "is" in the following
"be cautious of when your goal is to describe is making the leap".
I'm guessing it was intended to read
"be cautious of when your goal to describe is making the leap"
Link for convenience
https://www.r-causal.org/chapters/01-casual-to-causal#relationship-to-causal-inference
Again, thank you so much for all the effort and apologize is this is not the avenue for this.