-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.2k
Open
Open
Copy link
Labels
I-lang-nominatedNominated for discussion during a lang team meeting.Nominated for discussion during a lang team meeting.I-lang-radarItems that are on lang's radar and will need eventual work or consideration.Items that are on lang's radar and will need eventual work or consideration.P-lang-drag-1Lang team prioritization drag level 1. https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/410516-t-langLang team prioritization drag level 1. https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/410516-t-langT-langRelevant to the language teamRelevant to the language team
Description
rust-lang/rfcs#3678 (comment)
rust-lang/rfcs#3678 (comment)
@Amanieu @traviscross As discussed in today's @rust-lang/lang meeting, I already intended the language in the RFC to have the meaning you asked for, but the language around this had an ambiguous interpretation. To address the concern, I clarified the language around dyn-compatibility to make it more clear, and dropped the statement that removing final is always compatible.
(Filing this as an issue as an experiment as suggested by @nikomatsakis.)
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
I-lang-nominatedNominated for discussion during a lang team meeting.Nominated for discussion during a lang team meeting.I-lang-radarItems that are on lang's radar and will need eventual work or consideration.Items that are on lang's radar and will need eventual work or consideration.P-lang-drag-1Lang team prioritization drag level 1. https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/410516-t-langLang team prioritization drag level 1. https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/410516-t-langT-langRelevant to the language teamRelevant to the language team