reimplementation in python3.6

[fuuman]

Was there any issue with the implementation in python3 or why you decided to go with python2.7?

[salvadormrf]

Hi @fuuman this was a POC for a project that I was working. In the end we went for a more simpler approach. This code is far from being complete/accurate, but can be used as reference. Used python2.7 as the project uses python2.7.

[fuuman]

What exactly make this code incomplete or not accurate? I saw in your code some TODOs like adding cookie information to the har log. But that were just 3 or 4 missings values. The current har log seems pretty good to me. What is missing, that you would describe the outputed har file as complete/valid?

[salvadormrf]

@fuuman good to know then :) I mean it has no readme, tests, no pep8.. so for for me is "not complete". Feel free to improve it. I will play again with Chrome headless at some point :)

[fuuman]

Yeah, okay. But this is just "metadata", not so important for me at that point. Yes, me too. I am waiting for the release at the moment. Would be very nice to generate a full har log via python + chrome headless :)