This is related to #4 and #31 - the overhead necessary to review files each time dynamically gets the job done but is slow. A more comprehensive fix would be to have a default lazy-read option, with a list of known corrections that are applied instead of trying to detect and correct these issues on the side.
- Adjusting for inconsistent naming of seasonal adjustment codes.
- Accounting for missing column names as in the EB survey
- Accounting for the presence of multiple footnote_codes in the databases
This would allow the function to flow directly into reading the data, which combined with file caching should lead to a very fast user experience.
This is related to #4 and #31 - the overhead necessary to review files each time dynamically gets the job done but is slow. A more comprehensive fix would be to have a default lazy-read option, with a list of known corrections that are applied instead of trying to detect and correct these issues on the side.
This would allow the function to flow directly into reading the data, which combined with file caching should lead to a very fast user experience.