-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 51
json: fix cycle detection #153
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
extemporalgenome
wants to merge
10
commits into
master
Choose a base branch
from
kgillette/2025-07/fix-cycle-detection
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
e960845
json: consistent use of encodeNull (should inline well)
extemporalgenome dabc507
json: internal uses of Append now use new encoder.appendAny
extemporalgenome f786a42
json: refactor ref-cycle handling
extemporalgenome d8717df
json: support cycle detection involving maps
extemporalgenome 722d2e3
json: detect slice-based value cycles
extemporalgenome b34b8b9
json: remove unnecessary bespoke pointer types
extemporalgenome 41dfddc
json: seen data structure used in codec building supports non-structs
extemporalgenome 40c79bc
json: update cycle checking aspects from stdlib golang_encode_test.go
extemporalgenome 396975c
json: codec is passed as a pointer
extemporalgenome 9aaaa4b
json: pass remaining cycle/unsupported-value tests
extemporalgenome File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Worth adding some tests for this commit? (Or maybe coming in a later commit?)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I didn't add bespoke tests here because the borrowed stdlib tests provide very good coverage over this behavior. That's pretty easy because this PR was specifically developed against those stdlib tests, including the behavior in this specific commit.
That said, it looks like map cycles have no test coverage. I will add tests for that.