This is named like #20, but a different bug, as far as we know.
The commit neos/flow-development-collection@882be01 results in neos/flow@4d563e6 right now, using the subtree split. Splitting using splitsh it ends up in kdambekalns/flow@79cae3e. The latter looks exactly like the commit from the development collection…
Looking further, there is no difference between the results, but the hashes differ. To maximise confusion, GitHub actually shows a difference, locally Git says it's the same (https://github.com/neos/flow/compare/3.0...kdambekalns:3.0-splitsh?expand=1 vs. git diff 3.0..3.0-splitsh after cloning kdambekalns/flow)
The split was done using splitsh-lite --prefix=TYPO3.Flow --origin=origin/3.0 --target=refs/heads/3.0-splitsh
This is named like #20, but a different bug, as far as we know.
The commit neos/flow-development-collection@882be01 results in neos/flow@4d563e6 right now, using the subtree split. Splitting using splitsh it ends up in kdambekalns/flow@79cae3e. The latter looks exactly like the commit from the development collection…
Looking further, there is no difference between the results, but the hashes differ. To maximise confusion, GitHub actually shows a difference, locally Git says it's the same (https://github.com/neos/flow/compare/3.0...kdambekalns:3.0-splitsh?expand=1 vs.
git diff 3.0..3.0-splitshafter cloning kdambekalns/flow)The split was done using
splitsh-lite --prefix=TYPO3.Flow --origin=origin/3.0 --target=refs/heads/3.0-splitsh