Commit b20a23e
authored
Collapse adjacent blank lines. (#60)
Most of these runs of blank lines were added as a byproduct of the
RST-to-markdown export. In a few places, these were an intentional part
of authoring — for example, most of the reference has two blank lines
before a section heading — which we could put back if desired. I think
there is an argument to be made for the consistency of single blank
lines, from an authoring perspective. I don't remember the full
rationale from 2014 when Brian and I used the double blanks in the
reference.
Verified changes are only in blank lines with `git diff
--ignore-blank-lines`, which has no output. Also confirmed that there
are no changes in the HTML output from DocC.File tree
42 files changed
+0
-1322
lines changed- Sources/TSPL/TSPL.docc
- GuidedTour
- LanguageGuide
- ReferenceManual
- RevisionHistory
Some content is hidden
Large Commits have some content hidden by default. Use the searchbox below for content that may be hidden.
42 files changed
+0
-1322
lines changed| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
1 | | - | |
2 | | - | |
3 | 1 | | |
4 | 2 | | |
5 | 3 | | |
| |||
50 | 48 | | |
51 | 49 | | |
52 | 50 | | |
53 | | - | |
54 | 51 | | |
55 | 52 | | |
56 | 53 | | |
| |||
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
1 | | - | |
2 | | - | |
3 | 1 | | |
4 | 2 | | |
5 | 3 | | |
| |||
51 | 49 | | |
52 | 50 | | |
53 | 51 | | |
54 | | - | |
55 | 52 | | |
56 | 53 | | |
57 | 54 | | |
| |||
0 commit comments