Commit e64ec00
committed
[CodeCompletion] Fix issue in which parts of a result builder were incorrectly skipped
`getLoc` does not necesarrily return the start location of the location (e.g. for `a.b().c()` it returns the location of `c` because that’s the location of the call). But we used the location from `getLoc` as the start location of the synthesized `buildExpression` call. In the added test case, this means that the `buildExpression` call only contained `everlay() {}` and not the code completion token. We thus infered that we could skip it the entire `MyStack {}.pnTabGesture {}.everlay() {}` call for code completion, which isn’t correct.
rdar://1207983551 parent a3ed8cc commit e64ec00
File tree
2 files changed
+34
-2
lines changed- lib/Sema
- validation-test/IDE/issues_fixed
2 files changed
+34
-2
lines changed| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
227 | 227 | | |
228 | 228 | | |
229 | 229 | | |
230 | | - | |
231 | | - | |
| 230 | + | |
| 231 | + | |
232 | 232 | | |
233 | 233 | | |
234 | 234 | | |
| |||
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
| 1 | + | |
| 2 | + | |
| 3 | + | |
| 4 | + | |
| 5 | + | |
| 6 | + | |
| 7 | + | |
| 8 | + | |
| 9 | + | |
| 10 | + | |
| 11 | + | |
| 12 | + | |
| 13 | + | |
| 14 | + | |
| 15 | + | |
| 16 | + | |
| 17 | + | |
| 18 | + | |
| 19 | + | |
| 20 | + | |
| 21 | + | |
| 22 | + | |
| 23 | + | |
| 24 | + | |
| 25 | + | |
| 26 | + | |
| 27 | + | |
| 28 | + | |
| 29 | + | |
| 30 | + | |
| 31 | + | |
| 32 | + | |
0 commit comments