Commit 7fd4615
committed
SILGen: Fix crash when a stored property with an initial value has a reabstractable type
A constructor can constrain generic parameters more than the
type itself, either because there is a 'where' clause on the
constructor, or because the constructor is defined inside an
extension with a 'where' clause.
In this case, when the constructor calls a stored property
initializer to implicitly initialize a stored property with
an initial value, we must apply substitutions to get the
correct result type for the call.
If the original type of the stored property lowers differently
based on the abstraction pattern, for example if it is a
function type, then emitApply() would by default re-abstract
the result to the most specific abstraction pattern possible.
However, this was wrong because we store the result value into
the stored property, and a stored property's type should
always be lowered with the most generic abstraction pattern.
In practice, this meant if you have a stored property of type
(T) -> (), and an initializer with 'where T == String' for
example, we would call the initializer, to produce a value with
lowered type (@in_guaranteed String) -> (), then thunk it to a
(@guaranteed String) -> (), and try to store the thunk into
the stored property -- which has type (@in_guaranteed String) -> ().
This would either miscompile or trigger an assertion.
To get around this, we want to bypass the orig-to-subst
conversion performed in emitApply(). My chosen solution is
to have emitApply() emit the result into a
ConvertingInitialization set up to perform a subst-to-orig
conversion.
Now that ConvertingInitialization is smart enough to
peephole away matched pairs of orig-to-subst and subst-to-orig
conversions, this always reduces to a no-op, and the
emitApply() call produces and stores a value with the
correct abstraction pattern.
Fixes <rdar://problem/67419937>.1 parent 85b94a4 commit 7fd4615
File tree
2 files changed
+71
-2
lines changed- lib/SILGen
- test/SILGen
2 files changed
+71
-2
lines changed| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
11 | 11 | | |
12 | 12 | | |
13 | 13 | | |
| 14 | + | |
14 | 15 | | |
15 | 16 | | |
16 | 17 | | |
| |||
1058 | 1059 | | |
1059 | 1060 | | |
1060 | 1061 | | |
1061 | | - | |
1062 | | - | |
| 1062 | + | |
| 1063 | + | |
| 1064 | + | |
| 1065 | + | |
| 1066 | + | |
| 1067 | + | |
| 1068 | + | |
| 1069 | + | |
| 1070 | + | |
| 1071 | + | |
| 1072 | + | |
| 1073 | + | |
| 1074 | + | |
| 1075 | + | |
| 1076 | + | |
| 1077 | + | |
| 1078 | + | |
| 1079 | + | |
| 1080 | + | |
| 1081 | + | |
| 1082 | + | |
| 1083 | + | |
| 1084 | + | |
| 1085 | + | |
| 1086 | + | |
| 1087 | + | |
| 1088 | + | |
| 1089 | + | |
| 1090 | + | |
| 1091 | + | |
| 1092 | + | |
1063 | 1093 | | |
1064 | 1094 | | |
1065 | 1095 | | |
| |||
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
| 1 | + | |
| 2 | + | |
| 3 | + | |
| 4 | + | |
| 5 | + | |
| 6 | + | |
| 7 | + | |
| 8 | + | |
| 9 | + | |
| 10 | + | |
| 11 | + | |
| 12 | + | |
| 13 | + | |
| 14 | + | |
| 15 | + | |
| 16 | + | |
| 17 | + | |
| 18 | + | |
| 19 | + | |
| 20 | + | |
| 21 | + | |
| 22 | + | |
| 23 | + | |
| 24 | + | |
| 25 | + | |
| 26 | + | |
| 27 | + | |
| 28 | + | |
| 29 | + | |
| 30 | + | |
| 31 | + | |
| 32 | + | |
| 33 | + | |
| 34 | + | |
| 35 | + | |
| 36 | + | |
| 37 | + | |
| 38 | + | |
| 39 | + | |
0 commit comments