test: E2E test of integrated PatchPro system#8
Open
ezeanyicollins wants to merge 12 commits intodemo/patchpro-ci-testfrom
Open
test: E2E test of integrated PatchPro system#8ezeanyicollins wants to merge 12 commits intodemo/patchpro-ci-testfrom
ezeanyicollins wants to merge 12 commits intodemo/patchpro-ci-testfrom
Conversation
…hPro - Enhanced workflow to use single-step run-ci command - Added new functions with style and correctness issues - Test integrated Denis analyzer + LLM pipeline - Focus analysis on changed files only for efficiency
- Added patchpro-artifacts/ to .gitignore - Removed tracked artifact files that should be generated at runtime - Artifacts will be properly ignored going forward
- Added fallback strategies for git diff when no merge base exists - Better handling of PR file detection across different branch histories - Should now properly detect example.py changes for PatchPro analysis
- Set fetch-depth: 0 to get full git history in GitHub Actions - Simplified changed files detection logic - Should now properly detect example.py changes - Added debug output to show number of changed files
PatchPro Bot Enhanced ReportGenerated on: /home/runner/work/patchpro-demo-repo/patchpro-demo-repo/artifact Summary
Performance MetricsProcessing Statistics
Cache Performance
Scalability Features Used
Findings BreakdownBy Severity
By Tool
By Category
Generated PatchesAffected Files
|
- Added test comment to example.py - Should now run complete E2E pipeline with LLM patch generation - Test the full integrated Denis analyzer + LLM system
- Only add source code files (*.py, *.js, etc.) not artifacts - Explicitly exclude artifact/ and changed_files_only/ directories - This prevents pollution of git history with generated files
- Removed artifact/ and changed_files_only/ directories from git tracking - Added changed_files_only/ to .gitignore - These files should only exist during workflow execution, not in git history - Prevents git repository pollution with generated files
- Should now run complete pipeline with LLM patch generation - Workflow will not commit any artifacts to git - Test the full integrated Denis analyzer + LLM + patch application
- Use --tools ruff --tools semgrep instead of --tools ruff semgrep - Fix CLI argument parsing error that was causing workflow failure
- This should trigger a pull_request event (not workflow_dispatch) - Should post complete comment with generated patches visible - Test the full E2E with comment posting
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Testing the new integrated PatchPro system that combines Denis's analyzer with LLM pipeline in a single command.
Changes:
Expected behavior:
This tests the complete E2E flow for Friday delivery.