[O2B-1240] Display only physical productions by default and adds filtering for 'test' and 'debug' productions display

[xsalonx]

I have a JIRA ticket

• branch and/or PR name(s) include(s) JIRA ID
• issue has "Fix version" assigned
• issue "Status" is set to "In review"
• PR labels are selected

Notable changes for users:

• By default test and debug productions are excluded from data passes views. They can be included using filtering panel.

Notable changes for developers:

• Refactor Data passes overview models

Changes made to the database:

• NA

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 26.08696% with 51 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 45.77%. Comparing base (3444017) to head (bbb4f67).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
lib/public/utilities/expandNestedKey.js	0.00%	15 Missing ⚠️
...public/views/DataPasses/DataPassesOverviewModel.js	0.00%	15 Missing ⚠️
...public/components/Filters/common/FilteringModel.js	0.00%	6 Missing ⚠️
...ic/domain/enums/NonPhysicsProductionsNamesWords.js	0.00%	2 Missing ⚠️
...ataPasses/ActiveColumns/dataPassesActiveColumns.js	0.00%	2 Missing ⚠️
...iodOverview/DataPassesPerLhcPeriodOverviewModel.js	0.00%	2 Missing ⚠️
lib/server/controllers/dataPasses.controller.js	77.77%	2 Missing ⚠️
...ts/Filters/common/filters/TextTokensFilterModel.js	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️
...c/components/Filters/common/filtersPanelPopover.js	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️
...erview/DataPassesPerSimulationPassOverviewModel.js	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️
... and 4 more

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1940      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   45.54%   45.77%   +0.22%     
==========================================
  Files        1010     1014       +4     
  Lines       16680    16699      +19     
  Branches     2997     3006       +9     
==========================================
+ Hits         7597     7644      +47     
+ Misses       9083     9055      -28     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[graduta]

I believe the addition of [include][byName] it adds complexity without any benefit. It is not the same as the numerical values where we have to specify operator and limit.
In this case, it is a simple inclusion of strings