claude/reorganize-roadmap-aGOBp

[AutumnsGrove]

…scope items

• Move Patina to Phase 1 (First Frost) as completed
• Remove Mycelium and Gossamer (live on workshop page)
• Remove Pantry from Golden Hour (out of scope)
• Reorder Phase 4 (Full Bloom) with features-first approach: Meadow → Chronological → Private Reactions → Reeds → Rings → Thorn → Oak/Evergreen → Foliage → Community Themes → Terrarium → Curios → Weave → Outpost
• Clean up unused color mappings for removed features

Summary

Type of Change

• Bug fix (non-breaking change that fixes an issue)
• New feature (non-breaking change that adds functionality)
• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
• Documentation update
• Refactoring (no functional changes)
• Infrastructure/tooling

Testing

• Unit tests added/updated
• Manual testing performed
• N/A (documentation only)

Documentation Checklist

• No docs needed — This change doesn't affect user-facing features
• Docs updated — Help center articles updated to reflect this change
• Docs flagged — This needs doc updates but they're tracked elsewhere (link issue/TODO)

If docs are affected:

Which articles need updates?

What changed?

Checklist

• My code follows the project's style guidelines
• I have performed a self-review of my code
• I have commented my code where necessary
• My changes generate no new warnings
• Any dependent changes have been merged and published

---

Remember: Documentation accuracy is a feature. If this PR changes behavior, update the docs.

[claude]

PR Review: Reorganize Roadmap

Summary

Clean roadmap reorganization that moves completed items, removes out-of-scope features, and reorders Phase 4 with a features-first approach. Changes are focused and well-scoped.

Code Quality ✅

Strengths:

• Single-file change: Keeps the PR focused and easy to review
• Clean data structure updates: Properly maintains the nested phase/feature structure
• Consistent formatting: Follows existing patterns in the file
• Proper cleanup: Removes unused color mappings for deleted features (Gossamer, Pantry)

Minor observations:

• Indentation is slightly inconsistent on line 89 (extra tab before { name: 'Patina'...), but this appears intentional based on the surrounding context
• No functional impact from the changes—purely organizational

Potential Issues 🔍

No bugs found. This is a data-only change with no logic modifications.

Considerations:

1. Visual regression check recommended: While the data structure is correct, I'd recommend visually verifying the roadmap page renders correctly, especially:

   • Patina appears in First Frost phase with the internal: true flag
   • Removed features (Mycelium, Gossamer, Pantry) don't leave visual gaps
   • Phase 4 reordering displays as intended

2. Icon mapping completeness: The PR removes color mappings for gossamer and pantry but retains all other icon-to-color mappings. This is correct—confirming these were the only features using those specific colors.

Performance ✅

No performance impact. Static data changes with identical runtime characteristics.

Security ✅

No security concerns. This PR only modifies display data for a public-facing roadmap.

Test Coverage ⚠️

Manual testing recommended:

• Verify roadmap page loads without errors
• Confirm Patina displays in First Frost with proper styling
• Check Phase 4 feature ordering matches intended sequence
• Validate no broken icon references

Note: No automated tests exist for the roadmap component (**/*roadmap*.test.* found zero matches). This is acceptable for a primarily presentational component, but consider adding basic smoke tests if roadmap logic grows.

Architecture & Conventions ✅

Follows Grove patterns:

• ✅ Uses engine components via @autumnsgrove/groveengine/ui/*
• ✅ Maintains centralized icon registry pattern
• ✅ Preserves seasonal theming structure
• ✅ Respects phase-based development model documented in AGENT.md

Alignment with project goals:

• Moving Patina to completed (First Frost) accurately reflects infrastructure status
• Removing out-of-scope features (Mycelium on workshop, Pantry) keeps roadmap honest and focused
• Phase 4 reordering (Meadow → features → Terrarium) follows the stated "features-first approach"

Documentation ✅

PR description is clear about what was moved, removed, and reordered.

Suggested documentation check:

• Confirm workshop page properly documents Mycelium/Gossamer (mentioned as "live on workshop page")
• Verify no other references to Pantry exist that might confuse users

Recommendations

Required before merge:

1. Visual QA: Load /roadmap locally and verify rendering

Nice to have:

1. Consider adding a comment in the code documenting the Phase 4 ordering rationale (features-first approach) to help future contributors understand the intentional sequence
2. Screenshot of the updated roadmap in PR description would make review easier for non-technical stakeholders

Final Assessment

Status: ✅ APPROVED

This is a well-executed housekeeping PR. The changes are:

• Accurate (reflects current project status)
• Focused (single purpose, single file)
• Clean (proper cleanup of unused references)
• Safe (no functional changes, low regression risk)

The roadmap reorganization aligns with Grove's transparent, community-focused values—showing completed work honestly and keeping the roadmap realistic by removing out-of-scope items.

---

Reviewed with attention to Grove's warm, introspective voice and commitment to building meaningful queer-friendly infrastructure.

Recommendation: Merge after visual QA confirmation.