Biweekly Fee Report ending 2026-02-26#298
Conversation
Fee Allocator Payload ReportFee Allocator Payload ReportFile: 2026-02-26.json Fees Collected
Payload SummaryTotal Transactions: 15 Vote Incentives: $10,984.82 DAO Fees: $7,423.67 (17.44% of total) veBAL Fees: $22,795.97 (53.56% of total) Alliance Fees: $554.58 (1.30% of total) Partner Fees: $802.65 (1.89% of total) 💰 TOTAL USDC DISTRIBUTED: $42,561.69Allocation Efficiency: 100.00% of collected fees Transaction DetailsBribe Threshold: $410 Vote Incentives (6 transactions)
veBAL Transfers (2 transactions)
DAO Transfers (1 transactions)
Beets Transfers (1 transactions)
Alliance Transfers (2 transactions)
Partner Transfers (2 transactions)
Token Approvals (1 transactions)
This comment is automatically generated and will be updated when the payload changes. |
|
@jalbrekt85 Beets transfer should likely not be added if amount is zero. First fee run where there are no OP fees is likely the reason why we see this edge case |
yup, payload shows negative transfer amount for beets. i will manually remove this time and make ticket for future |
|
removed negative beets transfer: 301daf8 |
|
✅ Fee distribution files synced to multisig-ops Dates: 2026-02-12 to 2026-02-26 |
Checks before merging:
total_incentives+fees_to_vebal+fees_to_dao== usdc onchainaura_incentives/total_incentives~= aurabal's vebal capture (https://app.aura.finance/#/stats)earned_fees<= total_swept onchain (per chain)fees_to_dao/ (fees_to_vebal+fees_to_dao+total_incentives) == .175min(aura_incentives)> thresholdmin(bal_incentives)> thresholdAdditional checks: