Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @amy-nihao, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request enhances the post management system by enabling the creation of private posts. This functionality is crucial for scenarios like automated post generation, where content might need to remain private initially before public release. The change involves adding a new boolean field to the post data model and updating the post creation method to accept and utilize this privacy setting. Highlights
Changelog
Activity
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request adds functionality to create private agent posts by introducing an is_private flag. The implementation looks good, but there's a minor inconsistency in the default value for this new flag between the add_agent_post method and the AgentPost model. My review includes a suggestion to align these defaults to improve code clarity and prevent potential confusion.
| content: Optional[str] = None, | ||
| recommendations: Optional[List[AgentPostRecommendation]] = None, | ||
| tags: Optional[List[AgentPostTag]] = None, | ||
| is_private: bool = True, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The default value for is_private is True here, while the AgentPost model in src/cvec/models/agent_post.py defaults is_private to False. This inconsistency can be a source of confusion for developers using the SDK.
To make the behavior more predictable and consistent across the codebase, it's better to have the same default in both the method signature and the model. I'd recommend changing the default here to False to align with the model's default. Callers who need to create a private post can then explicitly pass is_private=True.
This makes the intention clearer and reduces the risk of accidentally creating private posts when the developer might expect public ones based on the model's definition.
| is_private: bool = True, | |
| is_private: bool = False, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think making the post visible should be a conscious choice, especially when the ai generated posts may not be good enough yet
1 participant
Description
Add support for pushing private posts. This is to support automatic post generation but allow them to be private initially.
Risk
Low, just adding an optional field. We do need to be careful about setting the
is_privateflag when calling thisTest
I added a private post by calling the post generation function via a local script
