220 bug inference arbitrary fov positions

[jeipollack]

Summary

Inference doesn't work for random positions in FOV limits described in #220.

Closes #220

What’s changed

• Updates to psf_inference.py and psf_inference_test.py
• Replace model_data_adapter.complete_data with inference_data_adapter.complete_data in the data arg to load_trained_psf_model function
• Add helper _convert_inference_data_to_tensorflow
• Change orchestration of data adaptation by doing the conversion after the trained psf model has been loaded

How to test / verify

Outline steps for reviewers or maintainers to validate the changes.
Include commands, scripts, or datasets if relevant.
Full validation results should be referenced in the associated issue, not pasted here.

• Run pytest
• Performed validation exercises results see issue [BUG] WaveDiff TFPhysicalPolychromaticField fails for arbitrary FOV positions due to exact-match lookup in find_position_indices #220 comment repeatability exercise for EVALUATION data schema pass

Scope

Indicate the type of PR:

• Feature
• Bug fix
• Hotfix
• Documentation / process change
• Internal / refactor
• Release

Optionally, note if this PR is part of a larger milestone or set of related PRs.

Changelog

Did this PR introduce user-visible changes?
If yes, a Scriv changelog fragment must be added and committed.

• Changelog fragment added (if applicable)

Reviewer Checklist

Reviewers should confirm the following before approving and merging:

• The PR targets the correct base branch (develop, or main for release PRs)
• The PR is assigned to the developer
• Appropriate labels are applied
• The PR is included in relevant projects and/or milestones
• Description clearly explains what has changed
• Issue references included, if applicable
• Code and documentation adhere to current standards (ruff)
• Documentation updates included, if relevant
• CI tests are passing
• All reviewer comments have been addressed

Next Steps / Notes (if applicable)

Any follow-up actions, known issues, or reminders for maintainers.

[jeipollack]

@ChaitanyaChawak can you review this PR after the big one #219 ? I will rebase when it's merged