Conversation
Review or Edit in CodeSandboxOpen the branch in Web Editor • VS Code • Insiders |
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Sorry @Dargon789, you have reached your weekly rate limit of 500000 diff characters.
Please try again later or upgrade to continue using Sourcery
✅ Snyk checks have passed. No issues have been found so far.
💻 Catch issues earlier using the plugins for VS Code, JetBrains IDEs, Visual Studio, and Eclipse. |
Summary of ChangesHello @Dargon789, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request introduces version Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request introduces version 1.9.17 across all packages, primarily to incorporate the new xr-sepolia network. The versioning seems consistent. However, I've identified a recurring issue with the changelog generation. Many packages have a changelog entry for "network: add xr-sepolia", even though this change is specific to the @0xsequence/network package. This makes the changelogs for other packages inaccurate and potentially confusing for developers. I've left a couple of specific comments highlighting this. It would be beneficial to adjust the release process to ensure changelog entries are specific to the changes within each package.
|
|
||
| ### Patch Changes | ||
|
|
||
| - network: add xr-sepolia |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This changelog entry seems to be incorrect for the @0xsequence/abi package. The change "network: add xr-sepolia" appears to belong to the @0xsequence/network package. This package, @0xsequence/abi, does not seem to have any direct changes related to adding a network, as it has no dependencies. It's likely this version bump is for dependency alignment. The changelog message should accurately reflect the changes within this specific package, or indicate that it's a version bump for dependency compatibility.
No description provided.