Skip to content

Export meta struct through native transport - #6130

Open
lloeki wants to merge 2 commits into
lloeki/native-libdatadog-payload-api-uptakefrom
lloeki/native-meta-struct-m1-consumer
Open

Export meta struct through native transport#6130
lloeki wants to merge 2 commits into
lloeki/native-libdatadog-payload-api-uptakefrom
lloeki/native-meta-struct-m1-consumer

Conversation

@lloeki

@lloeki lloeki commented Jul 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

AI-generated code disclosure: this PR was implemented with substantial AI assistance and manually reviewed and validated.

What does this PR do?

Adds transitional M1 meta_struct payload parity. dd-trace-rb preserves its existing per-key MessagePack encoding and passes opaque blobs through the native exporter. It supports string and symbol keys and custom zero-argument to_msgpack, including AppSec SerializableBacktrace.

Motivation:

Native trace export currently omits structured span metadata. This adds the first payload-compatible representation required by APMSP-3219 while preserving current dd-trace-rb wire semantics.

Change log entry

Yes. Native trace export now supports structured span metadata.

Additional Notes:

How to test the change?

  • Ran the native transport suite: 116 examples, 0 failures.
  • Added wire-conformance coverage for AppSec and AI Guard-shaped meta_struct values, including string and symbol keys, zero-argument to_msgpack, and SerializableBacktrace.
  • Ran Standard and Steep successfully.

@lloeki lloeki added the AI Generated Largely based on code generated by an AI or LLM. This label is the same across all dd-trace-* repos label Jul 30, 2026
@dd-octo-sts

dd-octo-sts Bot commented Jul 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thank you for updating Change log entry section 👏

Visited at: 2026-07-30 12:12:01 UTC

@datadog-datadog-prod-us1-2

datadog-datadog-prod-us1-2 Bot commented Jul 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Pipelines

⚠️ Warnings

🚦 3 Pipeline jobs failed

DataDog/apm-reliability/dd-trace-rb | build-gem   View in Datadog   GitLab

DataDog/apm-reliability/dd-trace-rb | microbenchmarks: [other]   View in Datadog   GitLab

DataDog/apm-reliability/dd-trace-rb | microbenchmarks: [profiling]   View in Datadog   GitLab

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎

This comment will be updated automatically if new data arrives.
🔗 Commit SHA: c23fdbb | Docs | Datadog PR Page | Give us feedback!

@lloeki
lloeki force-pushed the lloeki/native-libdatadog-next-uptake branch from 39c86b1 to 6fe683b Compare July 30, 2026 12:01
@lloeki
lloeki force-pushed the lloeki/native-meta-struct-m1-consumer branch from 5061fef to 3c80594 Compare July 30, 2026 12:01
@lloeki
lloeki force-pushed the lloeki/native-meta-struct-m1-consumer branch from 3c80594 to c193d99 Compare August 3, 2026 14:54
@lloeki
lloeki changed the base branch from lloeki/native-libdatadog-next-uptake to lloeki/native-libdatadog-payload-api-uptake August 3, 2026 14:55
gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d Bot pushed a commit to DataDog/libdatadog that referenced this pull request Aug 4, 2026
AI-generated code disclosure: this PR was implemented with substantial AI assistance and manually reviewed and validated.

# What does this PR do?

Ensures the combined libdatadog profiling artifact enables `catch_panic` for data-pipeline FFI entry points. It also adds a packaged C regression that triggers capacity overflow and verifies that the FFI returns an error instead of aborting the process.

# Motivation

The standalone data-pipeline FFI crate enables panic containment by default, but the combined profiling artifact disables dependency defaults and did not re-enable it. This closes [APMSP-3830](https://datadoghq.atlassian.net/browse/APMSP-3830) before the native trace exporter payload APIs ship together.

# Additional Notes

**Stack position: L0, current PR: [DataDog/libdatadog PR 2302](#2302

These open L0-L5 changes are not included in [libdatadog v38.0.0](https://github.com/DataDog/libdatadog/releases/tag/v38.0.0). They are planned to ship together in a single libdatadog v39 release, with the common dd-trace-rb uptake tracked by [R3 DataDog/dd-trace-rb PR 6143](DataDog/dd-trace-rb#6143).

Complete expected libdatadog review and merge order for that single v39 release:

| Level | libdatadog PR | Matching dd-trace-rb consumer |
| --- | --- | --- |
| **L0 (current)** | **[DataDog/libdatadog PR 2302](#2302 | Release prerequisite; no payload API consumer |
| L1 | [DataDog/libdatadog PR 2303](#2303) | [R4 DataDog/dd-trace-rb PR 6130](DataDog/dd-trace-rb#6130) |
| L2 | [DataDog/libdatadog PR 2305](#2305) | [R5 DataDog/dd-trace-rb PR 6129](DataDog/dd-trace-rb#6129) |
| L3 | [DataDog/libdatadog PR 2301](#2301) | [R6 DataDog/dd-trace-rb PR 6134](DataDog/dd-trace-rb#6134) |
| L4 | [DataDog/libdatadog PR 2304](#2304) | [R7 DataDog/dd-trace-rb PR 6132](DataDog/dd-trace-rb#6132) |
| L5 | [DataDog/libdatadog PR 2300](#2300) | [R8 DataDog/dd-trace-rb PR 6133](DataDog/dd-trace-rb#6133) |

L0-L3 are independent and can be reviewed in parallel. Merging them in the listed order is still recommended because it reduces integration and release-branch conflicts, and lands panic containment before the new payload surfaces. L4 is stacked on L1, and L5 is stacked on L4.

The matching payload consumers are [R4 DataDog/dd-trace-rb PR 6130](DataDog/dd-trace-rb#6130), [R5 DataDog/dd-trace-rb PR 6129](DataDog/dd-trace-rb#6129), [R6 DataDog/dd-trace-rb PR 6134](DataDog/dd-trace-rb#6134), [R7 DataDog/dd-trace-rb PR 6132](DataDog/dd-trace-rb#6132), and [R8 DataDog/dd-trace-rb PR 6133](DataDog/dd-trace-rb#6133). All depend through the common v39 uptake in [R3 DataDog/dd-trace-rb PR 6143](DataDog/dd-trace-rb#6143). The downstream review and merge order after R3 is R4, R5, R6, R7, then R8; R7 also depends on R4, and R8 depends on R7.

[DataDog/libdatadog-rb v37 PR 65](DataDog/libdatadog-rb#65) and [DataDog/libdatadog-rb v38 PR 66](DataDog/libdatadog-rb#66) are separate ordered prerequisite releases only for [R2 DataDog/dd-trace-rb PR 6131](DataDog/dd-trace-rb#6131) and its `ForkSafeRuntime` uptake. They do not contain the open L0-L5 changes or payload APIs. R3 is stacked on R2, but R3, rather than either prerequisite package, is the common v39 payload-API uptake.

L0 tracks [APMSP-3830](https://datadoghq.atlassian.net/browse/APMSP-3830); L1-L5 implement the payload work tracked by [APMSP-3219](https://datadoghq.atlassian.net/browse/APMSP-3219).

# How to test the change?

Prior local validation completed successfully:

- `nix develop -c cargo test -p libdd-profiling-ffi --features data-pipeline-ffi` passed the combined profiling/data-pipeline FFI suite: 57 tests.
- `nix develop -c cargo test -p libdd-data-pipeline-ffi --features catch_panic trace_chunks_new_with_overflow_capacity_returns_panic_error` passed.
- `nix develop -c cargo test -p libdd-data-pipeline-ffi --features catch_panic begin_chunk_with_overflow_capacity_returns_panic_error` passed.
- `nix develop -c cargo ffi-test --filter trace_exporter_panic_containment` built and passed the packaged C panic-containment regression.
- `nix develop .#nightly --command cargo fmt --all -- --check` passed.
- `nix develop -c cargo clippy -p libdd-profiling-ffi --all-targets --features data-pipeline-ffi -- -D warnings` passed.




[APMSP-3830]: https://datadoghq.atlassian.net/browse/APMSP-3830?atlOrigin=eyJpIjoiNWRkNTljNzYxNjVmNDY3MDlhMDU5Y2ZhYzA5YTRkZjUiLCJwIjoiZ2l0aHViLWNvbS1KU1cifQ
[APMSP-3830]: https://datadoghq.atlassian.net/browse/APMSP-3830?atlOrigin=eyJpIjoiNWRkNTljNzYxNjVmNDY3MDlhMDU5Y2ZhYzA5YTRkZjUiLCJwIjoiZ2l0aHViLWNvbS1KU1cifQ


Co-authored-by: ekump <edmund.kump@datadoghq.com>
Co-authored-by: hoolioh <julio.gonzalez@datadoghq.com>
@lloeki
lloeki force-pushed the lloeki/native-libdatadog-payload-api-uptake branch from a7ef512 to 703d524 Compare August 4, 2026 11:19
Encode each `meta_struct` value as MessagePack before allocating its
native span, then attach the per-key blobs through libdatadog. This
preserves structured metadata on the native path without exposing an
unowned native allocation to arbitrary Ruby encoders.

Stop warning about `meta_struct` now that native transport preserves
it, and cover AppSec backtrace compatibility on the wire.
@lloeki
lloeki force-pushed the lloeki/native-meta-struct-m1-consumer branch from c193d99 to 27476f6 Compare August 4, 2026 11:20
gh-worker-dd-mergequeue-cf854d Bot pushed a commit to DataDog/libdatadog that referenced this pull request Aug 4, 2026
AI-generated code disclosure: this PR was implemented with substantial AI assistance and manually reviewed and validated.

# What does this PR do?

Adds an opaque per-key `meta_struct` blob setter to `TracerSpan`. Keys are validated as UTF-8, while values are copied as uninterpreted binary data. This transitional API lets consumers pass their existing per-key MessagePack blobs without changing the Rust trace model.

# Motivation

Native exporter consumers cannot currently populate `meta_struct`, which blocks payload parity tracked by [APMSP-3219](https://datadoghq.atlassian.net/browse/APMSP-3219). The opaque setter provides the safe first stage before the language-neutral structured-value APIs.

# Additional Notes

**Stack position: L1, current PR: [DataDog/libdatadog PR 2303](#2303

These open L0-L5 changes are not included in [libdatadog v38.0.0](https://github.com/DataDog/libdatadog/releases/tag/v38.0.0). They are planned to ship together in a single libdatadog v39 release, with the common dd-trace-rb uptake tracked by [R3 DataDog/dd-trace-rb PR 6143](DataDog/dd-trace-rb#6143).

Complete expected libdatadog review and merge order for that single v39 release:

| Level | libdatadog PR | Matching dd-trace-rb consumer |
| --- | --- | --- |
| L0 | [DataDog/libdatadog PR 2302](#2302) | Release prerequisite; no payload API consumer |
| **L1 (current)** | **[DataDog/libdatadog PR 2303](#2303 | **[R4 DataDog/dd-trace-rb PR 6130](DataDog/dd-trace-rb#6130 |
| L2 | [DataDog/libdatadog PR 2305](#2305) | [R5 DataDog/dd-trace-rb PR 6129](DataDog/dd-trace-rb#6129) |
| L3 | [DataDog/libdatadog PR 2301](#2301) | [R6 DataDog/dd-trace-rb PR 6134](DataDog/dd-trace-rb#6134) |
| L4 | [DataDog/libdatadog PR 2304](#2304) | [R7 DataDog/dd-trace-rb PR 6132](DataDog/dd-trace-rb#6132) |
| L5 | [DataDog/libdatadog PR 2300](#2300) | [R8 DataDog/dd-trace-rb PR 6133](DataDog/dd-trace-rb#6133) |

L0-L3 are independent and can be reviewed in parallel. Merging them in the listed order is still recommended because it reduces integration and release-branch conflicts, and lands panic containment before the new payload surfaces. L4 is stacked on L1, and L5 is stacked on L4.

The matching payload consumers are [R4 DataDog/dd-trace-rb PR 6130](DataDog/dd-trace-rb#6130), [R5 DataDog/dd-trace-rb PR 6129](DataDog/dd-trace-rb#6129), [R6 DataDog/dd-trace-rb PR 6134](DataDog/dd-trace-rb#6134), [R7 DataDog/dd-trace-rb PR 6132](DataDog/dd-trace-rb#6132), and [R8 DataDog/dd-trace-rb PR 6133](DataDog/dd-trace-rb#6133). All depend through the common v39 uptake in [R3 DataDog/dd-trace-rb PR 6143](DataDog/dd-trace-rb#6143). The downstream review and merge order after R3 is R4, R5, R6, R7, then R8; R7 also depends on R4, and R8 depends on R7.

[DataDog/libdatadog-rb v37 PR 65](DataDog/libdatadog-rb#65) and [DataDog/libdatadog-rb v38 PR 66](DataDog/libdatadog-rb#66) are separate ordered prerequisite releases only for [R2 DataDog/dd-trace-rb PR 6131](DataDog/dd-trace-rb#6131) and its `ForkSafeRuntime` uptake. They do not contain the open L0-L5 changes or payload APIs. R3 is stacked on R2, but R3, rather than either prerequisite package, is the common v39 payload-API uptake.

L0 tracks [APMSP-3830](https://datadoghq.atlassian.net/browse/APMSP-3830); L1-L5 implement the payload work tracked by [APMSP-3219](https://datadoghq.atlassian.net/browse/APMSP-3219).

# How to test the change?

Prior local validation completed successfully:

- `nix develop -c cargo test -p libdd-data-pipeline-ffi` passed, including arbitrary binary values, overwrite semantics, null handles, and invalid UTF-8 keys.
- `nix develop -c cargo clippy -p libdd-data-pipeline-ffi --all-targets -- -D warnings` passed.
- `nix develop .#nightly -c cargo fmt --all -- --check` passed.
- The generated C header was rebuilt through `nix develop -c cargo run --bin release -- --out /tmp/opencode/native-meta-struct-libdatadog/x86_64-linux` and consumed successfully by the matching dd-trace-rb branch.
- `nix develop .#ruby34 --command bundle exec rspec spec/datadog/tracing/transport/native/tracer_span_spec.rb spec/datadog/tracing/transport/native/conformance_spec.rb spec/datadog/tracing/transport/native/transport_spec.rb spec/datadog/appsec/actions_handler/serializable_backtrace_spec.rb` passed 116 examples, including AppSec and AI Guard-shaped wire conformance.
- Targeted Standard and Steep checks for the native transport passed.




[APMSP-3219]: https://datadoghq.atlassian.net/browse/APMSP-3219?atlOrigin=eyJpIjoiNWRkNTljNzYxNjVmNDY3MDlhMDU5Y2ZhYzA5YTRkZjUiLCJwIjoiZ2l0aHViLWNvbS1KU1cifQ
[APMSP-3830]: https://datadoghq.atlassian.net/browse/APMSP-3830?atlOrigin=eyJpIjoiNWRkNTljNzYxNjVmNDY3MDlhMDU5Y2ZhYzA5YTRkZjUiLCJwIjoiZ2l0aHViLWNvbS1KU1cifQ


Co-authored-by: ekump <edmund.kump@datadoghq.com>
Co-authored-by: loic.nageleisen <loic.nageleisen@datadoghq.com>
@lloeki
lloeki marked this pull request as ready for review August 4, 2026 13:54
@lloeki
lloeki requested review from a team as code owners August 4, 2026 13:54
@lloeki
lloeki requested review from a team as code owners August 4, 2026 13:54
@lloeki
lloeki requested review from mabdinur and marcotc and removed request for a team August 4, 2026 13:54
Make the agent string-key policy and libdatadog copy ownership explicit.
Reset shared hash-iteration state, cover rejected key types, and load the
AppSec configuration required by the wire-level conformance fixture.
hoolioh added a commit to DataDog/libdatadog that referenced this pull request Aug 5, 2026
AI-generated code disclosure: this PR was implemented with substantial
AI assistance and manually reviewed and validated.

# What does this PR do?

Adds owned span-event construction and atomic attachment through the
data-pipeline FFI. It supports typed scalar attributes, homogeneous
typed arrays, empty arrays, event ordering, and UTF-8 validation.

# Motivation

The Rust trace model supports span events, but native exporter consumers
cannot populate them. This fills the span-event portion of the payload
parity work tracked by
[APMSP-3219](https://datadoghq.atlassian.net/browse/APMSP-3219).

# Additional Notes

**Stack position: L3, current PR: [DataDog/libdatadog PR
2301](#2301

These open L0-L5 changes are not included in [libdatadog
v38.0.0](https://github.com/DataDog/libdatadog/releases/tag/v38.0.0).
They are planned to ship together in a single libdatadog v39 release,
with the common dd-trace-rb uptake tracked by [R3 DataDog/dd-trace-rb PR
6143](DataDog/dd-trace-rb#6143).

Complete expected libdatadog review and merge order for that single v39
release:

| Level | libdatadog PR | Matching dd-trace-rb consumer |
| --- | --- | --- |
| L0 | [DataDog/libdatadog PR
2302](#2302) | Release
prerequisite; no payload API consumer |
| L1 | [DataDog/libdatadog PR
2303](#2303) | [R4
DataDog/dd-trace-rb PR
6130](DataDog/dd-trace-rb#6130) |
| L2 | [DataDog/libdatadog PR
2305](#2305) | [R5
DataDog/dd-trace-rb PR
6129](DataDog/dd-trace-rb#6129) |
| **L3 (current)** | **[DataDog/libdatadog PR
2301](#2301 | **[R6
DataDog/dd-trace-rb PR
6134](DataDog/dd-trace-rb#6134 |
| L4 | [DataDog/libdatadog PR
2304](#2304) | [R7
DataDog/dd-trace-rb PR
6132](DataDog/dd-trace-rb#6132) |
| L5 | [DataDog/libdatadog PR
2300](#2300) | [R8
DataDog/dd-trace-rb PR
6133](DataDog/dd-trace-rb#6133) |

L0-L3 are independent and can be reviewed in parallel. Merging them in
the listed order is still recommended because it reduces integration and
release-branch conflicts, and lands panic containment before the new
payload surfaces. L4 is stacked on L1, and L5 is stacked on L4.

The matching payload consumers are [R4 DataDog/dd-trace-rb PR
6130](DataDog/dd-trace-rb#6130), [R5
DataDog/dd-trace-rb PR
6129](DataDog/dd-trace-rb#6129), [R6
DataDog/dd-trace-rb PR
6134](DataDog/dd-trace-rb#6134), [R7
DataDog/dd-trace-rb PR
6132](DataDog/dd-trace-rb#6132), and [R8
DataDog/dd-trace-rb PR
6133](DataDog/dd-trace-rb#6133). All depend
through the common v39 uptake in [R3 DataDog/dd-trace-rb PR
6143](DataDog/dd-trace-rb#6143). The downstream
review and merge order after R3 is R4, R5, R6, R7, then R8; R7 also
depends on R4, and R8 depends on R7.

[DataDog/libdatadog-rb v37 PR
65](DataDog/libdatadog-rb#65) and
[DataDog/libdatadog-rb v38 PR
66](DataDog/libdatadog-rb#66) are separate
ordered prerequisite releases only for [R2 DataDog/dd-trace-rb PR
6131](DataDog/dd-trace-rb#6131) and its
`ForkSafeRuntime` uptake. They do not contain the open L0-L5 changes or
payload APIs. R3 is stacked on R2, but R3, rather than either
prerequisite package, is the common v39 payload-API uptake.

L0 tracks
[APMSP-3830](https://datadoghq.atlassian.net/browse/APMSP-3830); L1-L5
implement the payload work tracked by
[APMSP-3219](https://datadoghq.atlassian.net/browse/APMSP-3219).

# How to test the change?

Prior local validation completed successfully:

- `nix develop --command cargo test -p libdd-data-pipeline-ffi` passed
58 tests, including scalar values, homogeneous typed arrays, empty
arrays, ordering, ownership, and atomic failure coverage.
- `nix develop --command cargo clippy -p libdd-data-pipeline-ffi
--all-targets -- -D warnings` passed.
- `nix develop .#nightly --command cargo fmt --all -- --check` passed.
- `nix develop --command env
LIBDATADOG_VENDOR_OVERRIDE=/tmp/opencode/native-span-events-ruby bundle
exec rspec spec/datadog/tracing/transport/native/tracer_span_spec.rb
spec/datadog/tracing/transport/native/send_traces_spec.rb
spec/datadog/tracing/transport/native/transport_spec.rb
spec/datadog/tracing/transport/traces_spec.rb
spec/datadog/tracing/span_event_spec.rb
spec/datadog/tracing/span_operation_spec.rb` passed 123 native and
producer examples, including native wire output and legacy JSON
fallback.
- Targeted Standard and Steep checks for the native transport and
span-event paths passed.




[APMSP-3219]:
https://datadoghq.atlassian.net/browse/APMSP-3219?atlOrigin=eyJpIjoiNWRkNTljNzYxNjVmNDY3MDlhMDU5Y2ZhYzA5YTRkZjUiLCJwIjoiZ2l0aHViLWNvbS1KU1cifQ
[APMSP-3830]:
https://datadoghq.atlassian.net/browse/APMSP-3830?atlOrigin=eyJpIjoiNWRkNTljNzYxNjVmNDY3MDlhMDU5Y2ZhYzA5YTRkZjUiLCJwIjoiZ2l0aHViLWNvbS1KU1cifQ

---------

Co-authored-by: Julio <julio.gonzalez@datadoghq.com>
Co-authored-by: Edmund Kump <edmund.kump@datadoghq.com>
Co-authored-by: Julio Gonzalez <107922352+hoolioh@users.noreply.github.com>
hoolioh added a commit to DataDog/libdatadog that referenced this pull request Aug 5, 2026
AI-generated code disclosure: this PR was implemented with substantial
AI assistance and manually reviewed and validated.

# What does this PR do?

Adds an atomic batched FFI for complete span links, including 128-bit
trace IDs, span IDs, flags, tracestate, attributes, and ordering. All
borrowed input is validated and copied before insertion.

# Motivation

The Rust trace model supports span links, but native exporter consumers
cannot populate it. This fills the span-link portion of the payload
parity work tracked by
[APMSP-3219](https://datadoghq.atlassian.net/browse/APMSP-3219).

# Additional Notes

`dropped_attributes_count` is intentionally deferred by additive commit
[961044e](961044e).
Neither the Agent v0.4 nor indexed V1 span-link schema defines the
field, and current Datadog tracers do not produce non-zero counts. The
original implementation remains in the preceding commit and can be
restored by reverting the deferral commit.

**Stack position: L2, current PR: [DataDog/libdatadog PR
2305](#2305

These open L0-L5 changes are not included in [libdatadog
v38.0.0](https://github.com/DataDog/libdatadog/releases/tag/v38.0.0).
They are planned to ship together in a single libdatadog v39 release,
with the common dd-trace-rb uptake tracked by [R3 DataDog/dd-trace-rb PR
6143](DataDog/dd-trace-rb#6143).

Complete expected libdatadog review and merge order for that single v39
release:

| Level | libdatadog PR | Matching dd-trace-rb consumer |
| --- | --- | --- |
| L0 | [DataDog/libdatadog PR
2302](#2302) | Release
prerequisite; no payload API consumer |
| L1 | [DataDog/libdatadog PR
2303](#2303) | [R4
DataDog/dd-trace-rb PR
6130](DataDog/dd-trace-rb#6130) |
| **L2 (current)** | **[DataDog/libdatadog PR
2305](#2305 | **[R5
DataDog/dd-trace-rb PR
6129](DataDog/dd-trace-rb#6129 |
| L3 | [DataDog/libdatadog PR
2301](#2301) | [R6
DataDog/dd-trace-rb PR
6134](DataDog/dd-trace-rb#6134) |
| L4 | [DataDog/libdatadog PR
2304](#2304) | [R7
DataDog/dd-trace-rb PR
6132](DataDog/dd-trace-rb#6132) |
| L5 | [DataDog/libdatadog PR
2300](#2300) | [R8
DataDog/dd-trace-rb PR
6133](DataDog/dd-trace-rb#6133) |

L0-L3 are independent and can be reviewed in parallel. Merging them in
the listed order is still recommended because it reduces integration and
release-branch conflicts, and lands panic containment before the new
payload surfaces. L4 is stacked on L1, and L5 is stacked on L4.

The matching payload consumers are [R4 DataDog/dd-trace-rb PR
6130](DataDog/dd-trace-rb#6130), [R5
DataDog/dd-trace-rb PR
6129](DataDog/dd-trace-rb#6129), [R6
DataDog/dd-trace-rb PR
6134](DataDog/dd-trace-rb#6134), [R7
DataDog/dd-trace-rb PR
6132](DataDog/dd-trace-rb#6132), and [R8
DataDog/dd-trace-rb PR
6133](DataDog/dd-trace-rb#6133). All depend
through the common v39 uptake in [R3 DataDog/dd-trace-rb PR
6143](DataDog/dd-trace-rb#6143). The downstream
review and merge order after R3 is R4, R5, R6, R7, then R8; R7 also
depends on R4, and R8 depends on R7.

[DataDog/libdatadog-rb v37 PR
65](DataDog/libdatadog-rb#65) and
[DataDog/libdatadog-rb v38 PR
66](DataDog/libdatadog-rb#66) are separate
ordered prerequisite releases only for [R2 DataDog/dd-trace-rb PR
6131](DataDog/dd-trace-rb#6131) and its
`ForkSafeRuntime` uptake. They do not contain the open L0-L5 changes or
payload APIs. R3 is stacked on R2, but R3, rather than either
prerequisite package, is the common v39 payload-API uptake.

L0 tracks
[APMSP-3830](https://datadoghq.atlassian.net/browse/APMSP-3830); L1-L5
implement the payload work tracked by
[APMSP-3219](https://datadoghq.atlassian.net/browse/APMSP-3219).

# How to test the change?

Prior local validation completed successfully:

- `nix develop -c cargo nextest run -p libdd-data-pipeline-ffi` passed
59 tests, including atomic invalid-UTF-8 failure, ordering, and
ownership coverage.
- `nix develop -c cargo test -p libdd-trace-utils` passed the unit,
integration, and doc-test coverage for all affected encoders and
decoders.
- `nix develop -c cargo clippy -p libdd-trace-utils -p
libdd-data-pipeline-ffi --all-targets -- -D warnings` passed.
- `nix develop .#nightly --command cargo fmt --all -- --check` passed.
- `nix develop --command bundle exec rspec
spec/datadog/tracing/transport/native/tracer_span_spec.rb
spec/datadog/tracing/transport/native/transport_spec.rb
spec/datadog/tracing/transport/native/conformance_spec.rb` passed 119
native transport examples against the locally built artifact.
- `nix develop --command bundle exec rspec
spec/datadog/tracing/span_link_spec.rb
spec/datadog/tracing/distributed/propagation_spec.rb` passed 69
distributed-propagation examples with 1 existing pending example.
- `nix develop --command env
BUNDLE_GEMFILE=gemfiles/ruby_4.0_opentelemetry.gemfile bundle exec rspec
spec/datadog/opentelemetry_spec.rb` passed 164 OpenTelemetry examples.
- Full Standard and Steep checks passed on the matching consumer branch.




[APMSP-3219]:
https://datadoghq.atlassian.net/browse/APMSP-3219?atlOrigin=eyJpIjoiNWRkNTljNzYxNjVmNDY3MDlhMDU5Y2ZhYzA5YTRkZjUiLCJwIjoiZ2l0aHViLWNvbS1KU1cifQ
[APMSP-3830]:
https://datadoghq.atlassian.net/browse/APMSP-3830?atlOrigin=eyJpIjoiNWRkNTljNzYxNjVmNDY3MDlhMDU5Y2ZhYzA5YTRkZjUiLCJwIjoiZ2l0aHViLWNvbS1KU1cifQ

---------

Co-authored-by: Edmund Kump <edmund.kump@datadoghq.com>
Co-authored-by: Julio <julio.gonzalez@datadoghq.com>
Co-authored-by: Julio Gonzalez <107922352+hoolioh@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

AI Generated Largely based on code generated by an AI or LLM. This label is the same across all dd-trace-* repos tracing

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants