Remove manual AutoProcScalingStatistics declaration

[gfrn]

Since this is already being declared as an autogenerated ORM model, we do not need to declare it again. Doing so triggers a deprecation warning, and may cause undefined behaviour in future versions of SQLAlchemy.

This fixes #233

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 92.20%. Comparing base (88e2378) to head (1d53513).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #234      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   92.20%   92.20%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          27       27              
  Lines        4144     4143       -1     
  Branches      166      166              
==========================================
- Hits         3821     3820       -1     
  Misses        230      230              
  Partials       93       93              

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[ndevenish]

Do the other relationship declarations here have the same issue?

[ndevenish]

Also, I'm assuming the reason that #227 originally errored without this was that 8da097b hadn't been run/merged in, and so fixing before that merge cause the redundant declaration. Maybe we should make orm-update just apply the regeneration in-PR.

[gfrn]

Do the other relationship declarations here have the same issue?

I didn't expect them to, since they had different names and my local tests didn't fail, at least until Jake mentioned it. I've now replaced the other declarations with synonyms

Also, I'm assuming the reason that #227 originally errored without this was that 8da097b hadn't been run/merged in, and so fixing before that merge cause the redundant declaration. Maybe we should make orm-update just apply the regeneration in-PR.

Agreed, this might only happen again with new SQLAlchemy versions (in the distant future), but this is a good idea

[ndevenish]

You happy to merge or did you want to check anything else?

[gfrn]

You happy to merge or did you want to check anything else?

Happy to merge it, I'll do it now