Skip to content

Conversation

@renovate
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Dec 2, 2025

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change
derive_more dependencies minor 2.0.1 -> 2.1.0

Release Notes

JelteF/derive_more (derive_more)

v2.1.0

Compare Source

Added
  • Support #[display(rename_all = "<casing>")] attribute to change output for
    implicit naming of unit enum variants or unit structs when deriving Display.
    (#​443)
  • Support #[from_str(rename_all = "<casing>")] attribute for unit enum variants
    and unit structs when deriving FromStr.
    (#​467)
  • Support Option fields for Error::source() in Error derive.
    (#​459)
  • Support structs with no fields in FromStr derive.
    (#​469)
  • Add PartialEq derive similar to std's one, but considering generics correctly,
    and implementing ne() method as well.
    (#​473,
    #​475)
  • Add Eq derive similar to std's one, but considering generics correctly.
    (#​479)
  • Proxy-pass #[allow]/#[expect] attributes of the type in Constructor derive.
    (#​477)
  • Support Deref and DerefMut derives for enums.
    (#​485)
  • Support custom error in FromStr derive.
    (#​494)
  • Support custom error in TryInto derive.
    (#​503)
  • Support skipping fields in Add-like, AddAssign-like, Mul-like and
    MulAssign-like derives.
    (#​472)
Changed
  • The minimum supported Rust version (MSRV) is now Rust 1.81.
    (#​466)
  • Add-like, AddAssign-like, Mul-like and MulAssign-like derives now
    infer trait bounds for generics structurally (bound field types instead of
    type parameters directly).
    (#​472)
Fixed
  • Suppress deprecation warnings in generated code.
    (#​454)
  • Silent no-op when #[try_from(repr)] attribute is not specified for TryFrom derive.
    (#​458)
  • Missing trait bounds in AsRef/AsMut derives when associative types are involved.
    (#​474)
  • Erroneous code generated in Try/TryInto derives when Self type is present in
    the struct or enum definition.
    (#​489)
  • Dependency on unstable feature(error_generic_member_access) in Error derive when
    using Backtrace on a non-nightly toolchain.
    (#​513)
  • Broken support for #[<display-trait>("default formatting")] attribute without {_variant}
    being used as default for enum variants without explicit formatting.
    (#​495)

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 2, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 76.09%. Comparing base (43f049a) to head (45015bc).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #235   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   76.09%   76.09%           
=======================================
  Files          13       13           
  Lines        1945     1945           
=======================================
  Hits         1480     1480           
  Misses        465      465           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/derive_more-2.x-lockfile branch from 08b5095 to 45015bc Compare December 10, 2025 14:55
@tpoliaw tpoliaw merged commit f42c3df into main Dec 15, 2025
7 checks passed
@tpoliaw tpoliaw deleted the renovate/derive_more-2.x-lockfile branch December 15, 2025 11:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants