Improve Password-protected messages compliance #2911
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
sosnovsky
approved these changes
Dec 18, 2024
Collaborator
sosnovsky
left a comment
sosnovsky
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Works well now, thanks for quick fix!
Collaborator
Author
|
Should I make a new release?(1.6.1) |
DenBond7
deleted the
issue_2909_fix_password_protected_messages_compliance_issue
branch
sosnovsky
reviewed
Dec 18, 2024
...ypt/src/test/java/com/flowcrypt/email/api/retrofit/response/model/ClientConfigurationTest.kt
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Collaborator
Yes, please create a new release and send updated build to customer, thanks! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR Improved Password-protected messages compliance
close #2909
Tests (delete all except exactly one):
To be filled by reviewers
I have reviewed that this PR... (tick whichever items you personally focused on during this review):