-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
fix: propagate integrations instead of repository_roles
#62
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
…ons bypass_actors
Summary of ChangesHello @vedantthapa, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request addresses a critical configuration issue within the Terraform ruleset definitions. Previously, an Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request correctly fixes a bug where repository_roles were being propagated as integrations for repository rulesets, leading to a Terraform error. The change to use each.value.bypass_actors.integrations is correct and resolves the issue described in the CI failure.
While the fix is correct, I'd like to point out that the pattern for handling other optional bypass_actors like teams and repository_roles appears to be susceptible to errors if each.value.bypass_actors is null. The pattern used in this fix, try(each.value.bypass_actors.integrations, []), is more robust. It would be beneficial to create a follow-up PR to apply this safer pattern consistently across all bypass actor types. Additionally, enhancing modules/repository_base/rulesets.tftest.hcl with a test case covering bypass_actors would help prevent such regressions.
Every other argument ( |
Propagate
integrationsinstead ofrepository_roles, therepository_rolesbeing propagated down to integrations causes anInvalid valueerror when defining rulesets. Excerpt from the failed CI job -