fix: raise on image views

[beckermr]

JAX does not allow true array views, so we should not allow folks to use the Image.view method. Instead, I have extended the syntax of the Image.copy method to allow things about the image to be changed while making a copy.

TODO:

• make sure all doc strings are up to date and fully descriptive
• For tests that use views, but are not testing view, implement a jax-specific test or modify GalSim test suite so they run.
  • tests/GalSim/tests/test_image.py::test_complex_image
  • tests/GalSim/tests/test_image.py::test_undefined_image
  • tests/GalSim/tests/test_image.py::test_Image_basic
  • tests/GalSim/tests/test_hsm.py::test_moments_basic
  • tests/GalSim/tests/test_image.py::test_Image_view

[codspeed-hq]

Merging this PR will improve performance by 67.7%

⚠️ Unknown Walltime execution environment detected

Using the Walltime instrument on standard Hosted Runners will lead to inconsistent data.

For the most accurate results, we recommend using CodSpeed Macro Runners: bare-metal machines fine-tuned for performance measurement consistency.

⚠️ Different runtime environments detected

Some benchmarks with significant performance changes were compared across different runtime environments,
which may affect the accuracy of the results.

Open the report in CodSpeed to investigate

⚡ 1 improved benchmark
✅ 35 untouched benchmarks

Performance Changes

	Mode	Benchmark	BASE	HEAD	Efficiency
⚡	WallTime	test_benchmark_moffat_init[run]	97.2 µs	58 µs	+67.7%

Tip

Curious why this is faster? Comment @codspeedbot explain why this is faster on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.

---

_{Comparing no-views (6b13a69) with main (7b6aecc)}