[PSEUDO] Debug slow speed #16
Open
HiroIshida wants to merge 3 commits intomasterfrom
Open
Conversation
Owner
Author
|
output of output of To see the limit case I changed link number M=100 -> 1000, 10000, 100000 |
46df107 to
9a9f900
Compare
aa53334 to
b95e6e6
Compare
89ac881 to
b741e4b
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Found a strange speed down when wrapping a function by pybind11.
Because tinyfk takes advantage of the caching strategy, there should be almost no additional computational load when adding the same link points a lot.
As I expected, in the bench-marking via pure c++, no speed down is observed. However, doing the same thing inside a method
_solve_forward_kinematicsin pybind side, incurs a significant (almost 2x) slow down.To exclude the possibility that the huge overhead when passing objects between python-side and c++-side, I measured the time inside
_solve_forward_kinematicsbut the result doesn't change much.comparison of pure forward kinematics (without jac) at ff74fa3
pure c++
bench_tinyfk: 0.32 sec_solve_forward_kinematics : 0.55 sec
inside _solve_forward_kinematics : 0.53 sec