Skip to content

Conversation

@davideberius
Copy link
Collaborator

Successor to #13.

David Eberius added 6 commits October 12, 2017 18:56
… (Note: the progress switch counter is not yet functional). Made the bytes received counters more accurate. The software events code has been moved into the opal/runtime directory. Put all software events functions in macros that become noops when SOFTWARE_EVENTS_ENABLE is not defined. This still needs to be added as an MCA parameter. Made the software counters self-reliant without the PAPI component. Some of the changes have been added directly to MPI_Init and MPI_Finalize. These are temporary until a more robust method is implemented. Added some functions to the software events driver code to allow for registration with the new PAPI sde component.
…for the sde function calls even if the system does not have PAPI.
…the MPI_T symbols aren't found in the OPAL level.
… sent/received should be put into. Added some more protection into the code. Started work on getting rid of the loops in pml_ob1_sendreq.c.
… Moved the bytes sent/received counters to reflect when ompi updates its own internal counters. Cleaned up some unnecessary print statements in the papi sde code.
David Eberius added 2 commits October 20, 2017 16:27
…d an MCA parameter, mpi_spc_enable, for turning on specific counters. Cleaned up the code and added more documentation.
@davideberius
Copy link
Collaborator Author

davideberius commented Dec 8, 2017

Somehow my new commit created a bunch of conflicts. This looks like nonsense to me. Why is there a conflict statement in recvfrag.c that has one empty portion? That's not a conflict right? Example:
++<<<<<<< HEAD
++=======
+ int example_code;
++>>>>>>> Some commit message.

@bosilca
Copy link

bosilca commented Dec 8, 2017

recreate your branch from scratch starting from master. You can simply cherry-pick your commits.

@bosilca
Copy link

bosilca commented Mar 3, 2018

This PR has been replaced by #16 .

@bosilca bosilca closed this Mar 3, 2018
dong0321 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 26, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants