Require Julia v1.10 (LTS)

[dlfivefifty]

The motivation for this change would be to allow adding extensions without adding unnecessary dependencies for users on pre-v1.10.

In particular, this makes it easier to finish #311

See also JuliaMath/AbstractFFTs.jl#140

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 0% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 73.51%. Comparing base (7b20cb5) to head (23804f7).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
src/fft.jl	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #312      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   71.50%   73.51%   +2.01%     
==========================================
  Files           5        5              
  Lines         544      540       -4     
==========================================
+ Hits          389      397       +8     
+ Misses        155      143      -12     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[giordano]

I'm not sure this is strictly necessary for adding an extension: the extension would work only in Julia v1.9+, but can exist, without working also in previous releases. Requiring Julia v1.10 nowadays is a good idea regardless though.

[vtjnash]

Same for #318. I could add v1.6 support to that, but it seems quite unnecessary to assume that would be useful at this point

[stevengj]

Seems fine to me at this point to require 1.10.

[stevengj]

I didn't realize we could do this. So this automatically tests on the minimum-supported version from Project.toml?

[devmotion]

Yes 👍

[devmotion]

Is https://discourse.julialang.org/t/psa-compat-requirements-in-the-general-registry-are-changing/104958#update-november-9th-2023-2 still the recommended approach? Then this should be changed back to

Suggested change

	LinearAlgebra = "1"
	LinearAlgebra = "<0.0.1, 1"

[vtjnash]

That PSA says only to do that for packages that support < Julia v1.4, which this does not

[devmotion]

That's what the PSA said to do on 2nd November (https://discourse.julialang.org/t/psa-compat-requirements-in-the-general-registry-are-changing/104958#update-november-2nd-2023-how-do-i-determine-what-the-compat-entry-should-be-for-a-stdlib-3) but in the latest update on 9th November (https://discourse.julialang.org/t/psa-compat-requirements-in-the-general-registry-are-changing/104958#update-november-9th-2023-2) it seems to recommend this approach generally, without any specific lower or upper bounds on the Julia version.

[devmotion]

The PR probably should clean up a few unnecessary VERSION checks as well.