Skip to content

3.4-rc.2, MCP, Discord#40

Open
harryadel wants to merge 4 commits intoMeteor-Community-Packages:develfrom
harryadel:3.0
Open

3.4-rc.2, MCP, Discord#40
harryadel wants to merge 4 commits intoMeteor-Community-Packages:develfrom
harryadel:3.0

Conversation

@harryadel
Copy link
Member

@harryadel harryadel commented Jan 3, 2026

There're couple of packages that are ought to be updated first:


Thankfully @copleykj was wise enough to grant me access to MCP, so 3.1 is now available
https://github.com/Meteor-Community-Packages/meteor-packages


Now you might be wondering why I went through all of this trouble? MCP. Whenever I use Claude Code or any other tool it fails to take note of the latest "beta" releases so why not plug it directly into the source? I'm grateful that Kelly built this to allow the community to iterate faster and solve our problems.


BTW, a discord bot has been added. I don't use Slack much nowadays since the community moved to the discord so it'd be nice to have a bot to announce new package releases.

@harryadel harryadel changed the title Update app to 3.4-rc.2 3.4-rc.2, MCP Jan 3, 2026
@harryadel harryadel changed the title 3.4-rc.2, MCP 3.4-rc.2, MCP, Discord Jan 3, 2026
@copleykj
Copy link
Member

copleykj commented Jan 4, 2026

@harryadel Can you elaborate on why attachSchema could not be used? I think this is kind of moot as I'd like to move in the direction of typed:model in the future, but I'd like to understand this change anyway.

@harryadel
Copy link
Member Author

@copleykj I couldn't use it because of socalize:base-model wasn't 3.0 friendly so I temporarily disabled it. But since you had just merged in copleykj/socialize-base-model#26 I've re-enabled it back!
881dfb4

You may now clone the app the locally give it a test run, if it passes then you can publish the new version of Packosphere.

Copy link
Member

@StorytellerCZ StorytellerCZ left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Still going through the code, but it looks good. But my word doesn't really mean much as I'm not familiar with the codebase.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants