test: improve coverage for utility classes - #349
Conversation
Co-authored-by: RoiSoleil <3462260+RoiSoleil@users.noreply.github.com>
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #349 +/- ##
============================================
- Coverage 79.67% 79.67% -0.01%
+ Complexity 4042 4038 -4
============================================
Files 513 511 -2
Lines 17288 17258 -30
Branches 1339 1339
============================================
- Hits 13774 13750 -24
+ Misses 2947 2943 -4
+ Partials 567 565 -2 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
StringConstantsto verify constant values.ExtendedSafeRunnerto verify single element execution, iterable execution, and exception handling paths.PR created automatically by Jules for task 12754723206302569238 started by @RoiSoleil