forked from lidge-jun/opencodex
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
[WRONG BRANCH] chore: sync plugin lane with reviewed plan #41
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
OnlineChef
merged 2 commits into
feat/plugin-contract
from
plan/plugin-metrics-ratelimit-benchmarks
Aug 2, 2026
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The plan routes persisted rate-limit settings through the existing config save flow, but that flow reconciles only the
claudeCodesubtree. If an operator edits a persisted rate-limit value while the server is running, an unrelated runtime save writes the stale in-memory rate-limit value back to disk and silently discards the operator’s edit. Require rate-limit settings to participate in the live-save baseline/reconciliation policy, with an explicit conflict policy, and add regression coverage for an on-disk rate-limit edit followed by an unrelated save.Context Used: Focking gretig zijn en niet stoppen tot perfectie.... (source)
Artifacts
Focused rate-limit persistence validation source
Persisted rate-limit setting before unrelated save
Persisted rate-limit setting after unrelated save
Existing narrow config preservation tests
Prompt To Fix With AI