Skip to content

chore(deps): bump react-router-dom to ^7.15.0 (fixes 4 HIGH react-router CVEs)#317

Merged
DevanshuNEU merged 1 commit into
OpenCodeIntel:mainfrom
DevanshuNEU:chore/bump-react-router-cve
Jun 8, 2026
Merged

chore(deps): bump react-router-dom to ^7.15.0 (fixes 4 HIGH react-router CVEs)#317
DevanshuNEU merged 1 commit into
OpenCodeIntel:mainfrom
DevanshuNEU:chore/bump-react-router-cve

Conversation

@DevanshuNEU

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Summary

Bumps react-router-dom (floor ^7.15.0, resolves to 7.17.0) to clear 4 HIGH react-router CVEs that Trivy flags on every PR's Security Scan.

CVEs fixed (all in transitive react-router 7.13.0)

  • CVE-2026-33245 - XSS in unstable RSC redirect handling (fixed 7.13.2)
  • CVE-2026-34077 - DoS via reflected user input (fixed 7.14.0)
  • CVE-2026-42211 - turbo-stream arbitrary constructor invocation (fixed 7.14.2)
  • CVE-2026-42342 - DoS via unbounded path expansion in __manifest (fixed 7.15.0)

Changes

  • frontend/package.json: react-router-dom ^7.12.0 to ^7.15.0
  • frontend/bun.lock: react-router/react-router-dom 7.13.0 to 7.17.0

Validation

  • bun run typecheck clean
  • bun run test - 13 passed
  • bun run build - succeeds

Dependency bump only, no code changes. Unblocks the Security Scan check on other open PRs (e.g. #316) once merged into main.

…ter CVEs)

Trivy flagged react-router 7.13.0 (transitive via react-router-dom) with 4 HIGH CVEs: CVE-2026-33245 (XSS in RSC redirect), -34077 (DoS), -42211 (turbo-stream arbitrary constructor), -42342 (DoS via unbounded path expansion). All fixed by <=7.15.0; bumping the floor resolves react-router to 7.17.0, clearing all four.

Validated: frontend typecheck clean, 13 vitest tests pass, build succeeds. Dependency bump only, no code changes.
@vercel

vercel Bot commented Jun 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@DevanshuNEU is attempting to deploy a commit to the Dev's projects Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jun 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@DevanshuNEU, we couldn't start this review because you've reached your PR review rate limit.

More reviews will be available in 16 minutes and 1 second. Learn how PR review limits work.

Your organization has run out of usage credits. Purchase more in the billing tab.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans include higher PR review limits than trial, open-source, and free plans. In all cases, reviews become available again over time. During sustained high-volume PR review activity, CodeRabbit may temporarily slow when the next review becomes available.

Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: f12d10e8-91ae-4f58-85cc-1d235f95a444

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7a29b89 and 0600744.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • frontend/bun.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • frontend/package.json
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@vercel

vercel Bot commented Jun 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
opencodeintel Ready Ready Preview, Comment Jun 8, 2026 7:53pm

@DevanshuNEU DevanshuNEU merged commit 6e6abd9 into OpenCodeIntel:main Jun 8, 2026
8 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant