Skip to content

Conversation

@IAlibay
Copy link
Member

@IAlibay IAlibay commented Oct 23, 2025

Fixes: #1662

Checklist

  • Added a news entry

Developers certificate of origin

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 24, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 75.36232% with 17 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 92.80%. Comparing base (80cbc22) to head (cef9cb7).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...e/protocols/openmm_afe/equil_binding_afe_method.py 60.00% 16 Missing ⚠️
openfe/protocols/openmm_afe/base.py 90.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1614      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   95.32%   92.80%   -2.52%     
==========================================
  Files         183      183              
  Lines       15765    15803      +38     
==========================================
- Hits        15028    14666     -362     
- Misses        737     1137     +400     
Flag Coverage Δ
fast-tests 92.80% <75.36%> (?)
slow-tests ?

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@github-actions
Copy link

No API break detected ✅

@christopherkottke
Copy link

I am very interested in this feature, and I appreciate the hard work that is being done on this package in general. Is the code here ready for testing / do you have a timeline for when it might be released?

@IAlibay
Copy link
Member Author

IAlibay commented Jan 20, 2026

Hi @christopherkottke,

It's been a while since I had a chance to work on this, looking at the tests it seems like there were a few things that needed fixing - probably not an overwhelming amount for a first draft.

I'll bring this up for discussion internally - one of the biggest blockers we had with this was that we just didn't have enough compute to run tests / benchmark. Is this something you might be interested in helping out with?

@christopherkottke
Copy link

Hi @IAlibay,

We could be interested in running tests / benchmarking, but we would want to know what these tests/benchmarks would look like and how computationally expensive you expect them to be.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Abfe calculations cannot process charged molecules

3 participants