Skip to content

Conversation

@Dima73
Copy link
Contributor

@Dima73 Dima73 commented Dec 9, 2025

No description provided.

@WanWizard
Copy link
Member

No blindscan support for the gbtrio4kpro, only the gbtrio4k ?

@Dima73
Copy link
Contributor Author

Dima73 commented Dec 9, 2025

No blindscan support for the gbtrio4kpro, only the gbtrio4k ?

Why?
Everything here is correct.
BOX_NAME.startswith("gbtrio4k") = gbtrio4k and gbtrio4kpro

@WanWizard
Copy link
Member

I was referring to the other commit:

if BOX_NAME in ("gbquad4k", "gbue4k", "gbtrio4k", "gbquad4kpro", "gbtrio4kpro"):

does not include the gbtrio4kpro.

@zuchnet
Copy link

zuchnet commented Dec 9, 2025

Its possible to add blindscan function in Quad 4K Pro ?
Device GIGA DVB-S2X NIM (TS3L10)

@Dima73
Copy link
Contributor Author

Dima73 commented Dec 9, 2025

I was referring to the other commit:

if BOX_NAME in ("gbquad4k", "gbue4k", "gbtrio4k", "gbquad4kpro", "gbtrio4kpro"):

does not include the gbtrio4kpro.

https://github.com/OpenPLi/openpli-oe-core/blob/scarthgap/meta-gigablue/conf/machine/include/gigablue-gbtrio4kpro.inc#L20

@WanWizard
Copy link
Member

That includes the binary, yes. How is that related to setting thr brand name?

So it is ok not to set BOX_MODEL in case of the gbtrio4kpro, but it is needed for the gbtrio4k?"

@Dima73
Copy link
Contributor Author

Dima73 commented Dec 10, 2025

Honestly, I don't understand the point of the question.
What exactly is my mistake?

@WanWizard WanWizard merged commit 167a0a2 into OpenPLi:python3 Dec 10, 2025
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants