Skip to content

Add Cosmosmith multi-agent workflow rule#329

Open
devnomad-byte wants to merge 1 commit into
PatrickJS:mainfrom
devnomad-byte:add-cosmosmith-multi-agent-workflow
Open

Add Cosmosmith multi-agent workflow rule#329
devnomad-byte wants to merge 1 commit into
PatrickJS:mainfrom
devnomad-byte:add-cosmosmith-multi-agent-workflow

Conversation

@devnomad-byte

@devnomad-byte devnomad-byte commented Jul 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Adds a reusable Cursor Project Rule for multi-agent workflow governance.

The rule covers:

  • AGENTS.md as the canonical project constitution
  • task.md as the task ledger
  • thin adapters for Claude Code, Cursor, Copilot, OpenCode, and Trae
  • role handoffs across product, research, architecture, UI/UX, frontend, backend, QA, DevOps, and governance
  • verification evidence before marking work done

Local checks run:

  • node .\scripts\check-repo-hygiene.mjs --only rules passed
  • node .\scripts\check-repo-hygiene.mjs --only readme passed
  • node .\scripts\check-repo-hygiene.mjs --only security passed
  • node .\scripts\check-awesome-list.mjs passed

Note: npm test was not used as the final validation on Windows because several existing tests resolve script paths as C:\D:\... / D:\D:\... and also assert LF-only workflow text. The focused repository checks above passed for this contribution.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Added a new entry to the build tools and development section for a multi-agent workflow guide.
    • Expanded the repository’s guidance for coordinating AI-assisted work across multiple roles and tools.
    • Included a clearer reference path for teams looking to follow the recommended workflow.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Review Change Stack

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 40bb30bd-bef4-4557-a9c0-f200a290b1af

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b044f95 and d1c8df1.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • README.md
  • rules/cosmosmith-multi-agent-workflow.mdc

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

A new Cursor rule file, cosmosmith-multi-agent-workflow.mdc, was added defining a multi-agent AI coding governance process, including canonical/adapter file precedence, task protocol, role responsibilities, and an initializer command. The README was updated with a corresponding link and description.

Changes

Cosmosmith Multi-Agent Workflow Rule

Layer / File(s) Summary
Rule definition and README link
rules/cosmosmith-multi-agent-workflow.mdc, README.md
New rule file defines front-matter, canonical/adapter precedence, task protocol using task.md, role mesh responsibilities, prompt/context/harness/loop guidance, large ledger handling, and an optional initializer command; README gains a linked bullet describing the rule.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~5 minutes

Suggested reviewers: PatrickJS

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly and concisely describes the main change: adding a multi-agent workflow rule.
Description check ✅ Passed The description covers the rule purpose, key behavior, and validation notes, so it is mostly complete despite missing template sections.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant