[ISSUE-186][docs] Adjust the README title size and add emphasis to the official website and Discord entry points.#187
Conversation
|
Warning Review limit reached
More reviews will be available in 44 minutes and 50 seconds. Learn how PR review limits work. Your organization has run out of usage credits. Purchase more credits in the billing tab to continue. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based credits. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan refill rate. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses rolling per-developer review limits. Reviews become available again as older review attempts age out of the rolling limit window. Please see our Fair Usage Limits Policy for further information. 📝 WalkthroughWalkthrough
ChangesREADME Restructure
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
…e official website and Discord entry points.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@README.md`:
- Line 25: The heading "### 1. Logprob Computation (Training Stability)" uses a
level 3 heading marker (###) that skips a hierarchical level relative to the
surrounding section structure in the README, violating markdown linting rules.
Change the heading marker from ### to ## to align with the document's heading
hierarchy and ensure consistency with adjacent sections, or add the missing
intermediate heading level to maintain proper markdown structure.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
close #186
Summary by CodeRabbit