Skip to content

Javadoc: Overveable.takeWhile vs. takeUntil: the condition is inverted - #7856

Closed
ePaul wants to merge 1 commit into
ReactiveX:3.xfrom
ePaul:patch-1
Closed

Javadoc: Overveable.takeWhile vs. takeUntil: the condition is inverted#7856
ePaul wants to merge 1 commit into
ReactiveX:3.xfrom
ePaul:patch-1

Conversation

@ePaul

@ePaul ePaul commented Apr 14, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The current description of the difference between takeWhile and takeUntil just points to the evaluation time (before or after the element is emitted), but the (IMHO) more important fact is that the predicate is inverted between both: takeWhile emits just elements where the predicate is true, takeUntil just elements where the predicate is false (and the first true one).

…akeUntil.

The current description of the difference between takeWhile and takeUntil just points to the evaluation time (before or after the element is emitted), but the (IMHO) more important fact is that the predicate is inverted between both: one emits just elements where the predicate is true, the other just elements where the predicate is false (and the first true one).
@ePaul

ePaul commented Apr 15, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

The same sentence appears already in the 1.x and 2.x docs, but I suppose there is no point in fixing that?

@akarnokd

akarnokd commented Jul 7, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

The naming of stopPredicate was supposed to convey that.

I prefer not to change the docs.

@akarnokd akarnokd closed this Jul 7, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants