Quarantine MultiNetworkPolicy blocking test due to CNV-83350#4328
Quarantine MultiNetworkPolicy blocking test due to CNV-83350#4328yossisegev wants to merge 1 commit intoRedHatQE:mainfrom
Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughA test file was modified to mark a specific test as expected to fail with execution disabled. The Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 1 | ❌ 2❌ Failed checks (2 warnings)
✅ Passed checks (1 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
Report bugs in Issues Welcome! 🎉This pull request will be automatically processed with the following features: 🔄 Automatic Actions
📋 Available CommandsPR Status Management
Review & Approval
Testing & Validation
Container Operations
Cherry-pick Operations
Label Management
✅ Merge RequirementsThis PR will be automatically approved when the following conditions are met:
📊 Review ProcessApprovers and ReviewersApprovers:
Reviewers:
Available Labels
AI Features
💡 Tips
For more information, please refer to the project documentation or contact the maintainers. |
|
/verified |
Test execution plan request detailsCRITICAL: You MUST post an inline review comment on the first changed line of the first file. As an expert software testing engineer, analyze all modified files in this PR and create a targeted test execution plan. Analysis Requirements:
Your deliverable: Test Execution Plan
Guidelines:
Hardware-Related Checks (SR-IOV, GPU, DPDK): When PR modifies fixtures for hardware-specific resources:
CRITICAL WORKFLOW COMPLETION RULES: When responding to this test execution plan request, you MUST follow these rules EXACTLY:
ABSOLUTE PROHIBITIONS (violating these creates empty/meaningless reviews):
Remember: The pull request review is visible to users. Additional comments are redundant noise. CRITICAL: Before setting "Run smoke tests: True", you MUST use shell scripts to: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In `@tests/network/flat_overlay/test_multi_network_policy.py`:
- Around line 31-34: The xfail decorator call uses an unnecessary pair of
parentheses around the f-string; update the pytest.mark.xfail invocation to
remove the extra parentheses so the reason argument is passed as
pytest.mark.xfail(reason=f"{QUARANTINED}: Ingress-blocking MNP is not
functioning in 4.22: CNV-83350", run=False) — modify the line containing
pytest.mark.xfail and the f-string that references QUARANTINED and CNV-83350
accordingly.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 4903bd58-7630-4b23-94a7-5dfe8f0a37cf
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
tests/network/flat_overlay/test_multi_network_policy.py
| @pytest.mark.xfail( | ||
| reason=(f"{QUARANTINED}: Ingress-blocking MNP is not functioning in 4.22: CNV-83350"), | ||
| run=False, | ||
| ) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick | 🔵 Trivial
LGTM - Correct quarantine pattern.
The xfail with run=False properly disables test execution while retaining the test code. The reason string correctly uses the QUARANTINED constant and references the tracking bug CNV-83350.
LOW: The parentheses around the f-string are unnecessary and can be simplified:
✨ Optional cleanup
`@pytest.mark.xfail`(
- reason=(f"{QUARANTINED}: Ingress-blocking MNP is not functioning in 4.22: CNV-83350"),
+ reason=f"{QUARANTINED}: Ingress-blocking MNP is not functioning in 4.22: CNV-83350",
run=False,
)Based on learnings: "In the openshift-virtualization-tests repository, when quarantining flaky tests, the team uses two separate Jira tickets: one for the quarantine action itself (referenced in the PR description) and another for tracking and investigating the underlying issue (referenced in the xfail marker reason)."
,
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| @pytest.mark.xfail( | |
| reason=(f"{QUARANTINED}: Ingress-blocking MNP is not functioning in 4.22: CNV-83350"), | |
| run=False, | |
| ) | |
| `@pytest.mark.xfail`( | |
| reason=f"{QUARANTINED}: Ingress-blocking MNP is not functioning in 4.22: CNV-83350", | |
| run=False, | |
| ) |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
In `@tests/network/flat_overlay/test_multi_network_policy.py` around lines 31 -
34, The xfail decorator call uses an unnecessary pair of parentheses around the
f-string; update the pytest.mark.xfail invocation to remove the extra
parentheses so the reason argument is passed as
pytest.mark.xfail(reason=f"{QUARANTINED}: Ingress-blocking MNP is not
functioning in 4.22: CNV-83350", run=False) — modify the line containing
pytest.mark.xfail and the f-string that references QUARANTINED and CNV-83350
accordingly.
| from tests.network.flat_overlay.constants import CONNECTION_REQUESTS, HTTP_SUCCESS_RESPONSE_STR | ||
| from tests.network.flat_overlay.utils import get_vm_connection_reply | ||
| from tests.network.utils import assert_no_ping | ||
| from utilities.constants import QUARANTINED |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Test Execution Plan
- Run smoke tests: False (No dependency path from smoke tests to the changed file; this is a marker-only quarantine change)
tests/network/flat_overlay/test_multi_network_policy.py::test_negative_ingress_multi_network_policy— verify the test is correctly quarantined (XFail, not collected/run)
|
Tip For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes. 🧩 Analysis chain🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 3003 🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 40 🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 1735 🧠 Learnings used |
jira-ticket:
https://redhat.atlassian.net/browse/CNV-83350
Summary by CodeRabbit