Update Master with Develop

[Gui-FernandesBR]

No description provided.

[Gui-FernandesBR]

I noticed now that the auto changelog feature has been working, but unfortunately not that smartly, sometimes it repeats entry.
I will fix it as soon as possible, let's not worry so much about the CHANGELOG.md file for now.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 74.77004% with 384 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 80.85%. Comparing base (ba9d130) to head (ce3342f).
⚠️ Report is 3 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
rocketpy/plots/flight_plots.py	58.67%	286 Missing ⚠️
rocketpy/mathutils/_calc/evaluator.py	85.14%	45 Missing ⚠️
rocketpy/mathutils/_calc/polation_1d.py	81.09%	38 Missing ⚠️
rocketpy/mathutils/_calc/polation_base.py	75.00%	4 Missing ⚠️
rocketpy/mathutils/_calc/registry.py	88.88%	4 Missing ⚠️
rocketpy/mathutils/_calc/polation_nd.py	96.62%	3 Missing ⚠️
rocketpy/mathutils/_calc/_fitting.py	97.77%	2 Missing ⚠️
rocketpy/mathutils/vector_matrix.py	95.45%	2 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1068      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   81.84%   80.85%   -1.00%     
==========================================
  Files         115      122       +7     
  Lines       15145    16355    +1210     
==========================================
+ Hits        12396    13224     +828     
- Misses       2749     3131     +382     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[Gui-FernandesBR]

documentation not building, codecoverage not passing... Needss fix

[MateusStano]

Docs are building on ReadTheDocs. The check is only failing because of this warning

/home/runner/work/RocketPy/RocketPy/rocketpy/plots/flight_plots.py:docstring of rocketpy.plots.flight_plots._FlightPlots.animate_trajectory: WARNING: invalid value set (missing closing brace): {"speed", "mach", "dynamic_pressure", "acceleration",

And the tests coverage are only failing because of the new animation methods on _FlightPlots: _add_animation_charts, _update_animation_chart_cursors, _ground_bounds_from_spec, _ground_bounds_from_spec, _update_animation_camera, _rocket_axial_display_coordinate, _animation_phase, _rotation_telemetry, _animation_background_palette, _style_animation_slider, _run_animation etc

I am not sure these are easily testable though, some seem to depend on interactions on the simulation render

@phmbressan could you can fix this? If these are not testable just flag them as not testable.